"What the Tortoise Said to Achilles", written by Lewis Carroll in 1895 for the philosophical journal Mind, in which Achilles could never overtake the tortoise in a race. In Carroll's dialogue, the tortoise challenges Achilles to use the force of logic to make him accept the conclusion of a simple deductive argument. Ultimately, Achilles fails, because the clever tortoise leads him into an infinite regression.

  • A: "Things that are equal to the same are equal to each other" (a Euclidean relation)
  • B: "The two sides of this triangle are things that are equal to the same"
  • Therefore, Z: "The two sides of this triangle are equal to each other"

The tortoise accepts premises A and B as true but not the hypothetical:

  • C: "If A and B are true, Z must be true" later reworked in more sober philosophical terms by W.V.O. Quine.

Editions

Reprinted:

  • in the New Series of the same journal, a century later:
  • in
  • on a number of websites, including "What the Tortoise Said to Achilles" at Digital Text International, and "What the Tortoise Said to Achilles" at Fair Use Repository.
  • on Wikisource: .
  • in Reprinted as the second dialogue, entitled "Two-Part Invention – or What the Tortoise Said to Achilles", between chapters 1 and 2. Hofstadter appropriated the characters of Achilles and the Tortoise for other, original, dialogues in the book which alternate contrapuntally with prose chapters.

As audio:

See also

  • Deduction theorem
  • Homunculus argument
  • Münchhausen trilemma
  • Paradox
  • Regress argument
  • Rule of inference

Other works

  • Gödel, Escher, Bach, a book by Douglas Hofstadter which includes this story (though retitled as "Two-Part Invention"), and original stories with the Tortoise and Achilles characters

References

Further reading

  • Moktefi, Amirouche & Abeles, Francine F. (eds.). “‘What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’: Lewis Carroll's Paradox of Inference.” The Carrollian: The Lewis Carroll Journal, No. 28, November 2016. [Special issue.]