Trifunctional hypothesis

thumb|right|This part of the 12th-century Swedish [[Skog tapestry has, possibly erroneously, been interpreted to show, from left to right, the one-eyed Odin, the hammer-wielding Thor and Freyr holding up wheat. Terje Leiren believes this grouping corresponds closely to the trifunctional division.]]

The trifunctional hypothesis is a theory that prehistoric

Proto-Indo-European society and religion reflected a tripartite ideology

("idéologie tripartite") organized around three functions: the

sacral, or sovereign, the martial, and the productive, or

economic.

These functions were sometimes associated with three social classes or

castes: priests, warriors, and commoners (farmers,

herders, craftspeople or tradesmen).

The trifunctional thesis is primarily associated with the French

comparative mythologist Georges Dumézil,

who developed the hypothesis across studies of Roman, Indo-Iranian, Germanic

and epic traditions, notably in Flamen-Brahman

In Dumézil's later formulation, the hypothesis concerned a religious

and ideological structure rather than a direct reconstruction of three original

social classes.

Sovereignty, which fell into two distinct and complementary sub-parts:
one formal, juridical and priestly but worldly;
the other powerful, unpredictable and priestly but rooted in the supernatural world.
Military, connected with force, the military and war.
Productivity, fertility, prosperity, herding, farming, food, wealth and crafts; ruled by the other two.

Dumézil initially related the three functions to social organization, but later described them chiefly as an ideological pattern. The pattern could be expressed in social classes, ritual institutions, groups of gods, myths, heroic narratives and legendary history.

Early Baltic society: Norbertas Vėlius, in his book Senovės baltų pasaulėžiūra (The Ancient Baltic Worldview), identified three regions with three classes. The priestly class was centered in Prussia, the warrior class was prominent in the outer highlands, and the farming class predominated in the intermediate flatlands.
Early Germanic society: Dumézil identified a division between the king, warrior aristocracy and regular freemen.
Norse mythology: Odin (sovereignty), Týr (law and justice), the Vanir (fertility). Odin has been interpreted as a death-god and connected to cremations, and has also been associated with ecstatic practices.
Roman religion: Dumézil interpreted the archaic triad of Jupiter, Mars and Quirinus as a Roman expression of the three functions, with Jupiter representing sovereignty, Mars war, and Quirinus the third function of productivity and civic fertility.
India: the three higher Hindu varnas, the Brahmins or priests, the Kshatriyas, the warriors and military, and the Vaishyas, the agriculturalists, cattle rearers and traders. The Shudra is a fourth varna. Dumézil and other scholars also compared Indo-Iranian divine pairs and groups, such as Mitra and Varuna, with the first function of sovereignty. In this interpretation, a foundational conflict opposes representatives of the first two functions, sovereignty and warfare, to representatives of the third function, associated with fertility, wealth, women, food, prosperity or productive abundance. The conflict ends not by eliminating the third function, but by incorporating it into the victorious group. The resulting society or pantheon becomes complete only after the three functions have been joined.

The Roman legend of the Rape of the Sabine women has been treated as a central example in this interpretation. In this reading, the early Romans represent the first and second functions, while the Sabines represent the third function through wealth, fecundity and marriage. The abduction of the Sabine women leads to war between Romans and Sabines, but the conflict is resolved when the women intervene and the two peoples are united under a shared political order. Other scholars have explained the Sabine legend as a projection of later Sabine incursions and incorporation into the Roman state, or as reflecting a significant Sabine element in Rome's earliest population. In this interpretation, the Greek side is associated especially with royal and warrior functions, while Troy is associated with wealth, luxury and the third function. Benveniste initially criticized aspects of Dumézil's comparative method, but later supported the tripartite model and developed related arguments from Indo-European institutional vocabulary. C. Scott Littleton helped develop and disseminate Dumézilian comparison in Indo-European studies and comparative mythology.

The hypothesis was embraced outside the field of Indo-European studies by some mythographers, anthropologists and historians such as Mircea Eliade, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Marshall Sahlins, Rodney Needham, Jean-Pierre Vernant and Georges Duby. Duby used the model in his analysis of the medieval estates of the realm, especially the division between those who pray, those who fight and those who work. Jacques Le Goff argued that in medieval studies the significance of the model lay less in proving Indo-European origins than in explaining how a social ideology worked and whose interests it served.

Some scholars have sought to modify rather than reject Dumézil's model. Although critical of strict tripartition, Nicholas Allen has suggested that Dumézil's three functions may form part of a broader classificatory system, and argued that reconstructions of Indo-European myth and poetry that rely less on Dumézil's system can understate the importance of ordered groupings of gods, heroes and social roles. André Sauzeau and Pierre Sauzeau have argued for a fourth function associated with disorder, marginality, ambiguity and transformation.

Other scholars have questioned the scope, coherence or historical application of the hypothesis. Benjamin W. Fortson reports a view that Dumézil blurred the lines between the three functions and that some examples had contradictory characteristics. Jan Gonda also raised methodological objections to Dumézil's use of Indo-Iranian evidence. Cristiano Grottanelli stated that while Dumézilian trifunctionalism may be visible in modern and medieval contexts, its projection onto earlier cultures is mistaken. Wouter W. Belier criticized the origin and development of Dumézil's tripartite ideology. Arnaldo Momigliano argued in particular that Dumézil's approach had not shown how alleged Indo-European survivals related to the wider body of Roman beliefs, rituals and institutions.

The hypothesis and Dumézil's scholarship have also been discussed in relation to his political background and the politics of Indo-European studies. Historians including Carlo Ginzburg, Arnaldo Momigliano and Bruce Lincoln connected Dumézil's work with his sympathies for the political right or with the possible projection of modern hierarchical ideology onto ancient materials. Guy Stroumsa discussed the resulting controversy and treated it as significant for the study of mythology, religion and modern politics.

The trifunctional hypothesis continues to be discussed in comparative mythology and Indo-European studies. Some modern comparativists, such as M. L. West, have reconstructed Indo-European myth and poetry with less reliance on Dumézil's system.

Trifunctional hypothesis

See also

Notes

References

Sources