The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering is a book by Norman Finkelstein arguing that the American Jewish establishment exploits the memory of the Nazi Holocaust for political and financial gain and to further Israeli interests. According to Finkelstein, this "Holocaust industry" has corrupted Jewish culture and the authentic memory of the Holocaust.

The book was controversial, attracting both praise as well as criticism. Supporters of the book, such as preeminent Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg, described it as a substantive engagement with issues such as the politics of memory. Critics of the book, such as Peter Novick, declared that many of Finkelstein's assertions are “pure invention” and called the book “a twenty-first century updating of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

Conception

The book began as a journal review of The Holocaust in American Life, by Peter Novick.

Synopsis

The Holocaust Industry

Finkelstein follows the Holocaust's standing in American life from the postwar years to the end of the 20th century. Before the 1967 Arab–Israeli War, he argues, the Holocaust took little part in the lives of American Gentiles and Jews. There was, for example, at that time only a small number of books and films on the Holocaust and few works of scholarship. Not until the late 20th century, especially after the 1967 War, did the Holocaust take up its role as the foremost historical event in the American mind – so Finkelstein argues.

In The New York Times Book Review, historian Omer Bartov said the book "is filled with precisely the kind of shrill hyperbole that Finkelstein rightly deplores in much of the current media hype over the Holocaust; it is brimming with the same indifference to historical facts, inner contradictions, strident politics and dubious contextualizations; and it oozes with the same smug sense of moral and intellectual superiority." Bartov acknowledged, "Like any conspiracy theory, it contains several grains of truth", but added that "like any such theory, it is both irrational and insidious." Referring to the book's accusations about Swiss banks and forced labor, Hilberg later wrote:

Israeli historian Moshe Zuckermann welcomed the book as an "irreplaceable critique of the 'instrumentalisation of the past' and underlined its 'liberating potential'".

In the journal Historical Materialism, Enzo Traverso wrote that Finkelstein's book "contains a core of truth that must be recognised, but it lends itself, due to its style and several of its main arguments, to the worst uses and instrumentalisations." He suggested that the book should be seen as an opportunity for stimulating public debates about difficult topics related to "the politics of memory and on the public uses of history". Denton opined that the controversial book "probably cost [Finkelstein] ... tenure at DePaul University".

Wolfgang Benz stated in Le Monde: "It is impossible to learn anything from Finkelstein's book. At best, it is interesting for a psychotherapist." In the same newspaper, Jean Birnbaum faulted Finkelstein for an approach that "hardly cares about nuance". Rony Brauman wrote in the preface to the French edition (L'Industrie de l'Holocauste, Paris, La Fabrique, 2001) that some assertions by Finkelstein (especially on the impact of the Six-Day War) are wrong, others being pieces of "propaganda".

Peter Novick, whose The Holocaust in American Life Finkelstein had credited with providing the "initial stimulus" for The Holocaust Industry, said in the July 28, 2000 issue of The Jewish Chronicle that Finkelstein's book is replete with "false accusations", "egregious misrepresentations", "absurd claims" and "repeated mis-statements" ("A charge into darkness that sheds no light"). Finkelstein replied on his website to five specific charges made by Novick, and then more broadly attacked the "intellectual standards" of his opponents.

Historian Hasia Diner characterized both Finkelstein and Novick as "harsh critics of American Jewry from the left", and challenged "the myth of silence" put forth by the two authors that American Jews did not begin to commemorate the Holocaust until after 1967.

Andrew Ross, reviewing the book for Salon, said that Finkelstein downplays documented wrongdoing by Swiss and German institutions in the reparations process and exaggerates claims that Jewish organizations routinely swindled Holocaust survivors, arguing that delays in compensation were largely due to legal and procedural factors rather than institutional malfeasance.

Alvin Hirsch Rosenfeld wrote that The Holocaust Industry "is representative of a polemical engagement with the Holocaust" that places it in line with a number of other works by "critics of Holocaust consciousness, all of whom stress the utilitarian function of memory", and who see many modern references to The Holocaust as "means of enhancing ethnic identity and advancing political agendas of one kind or another". Rosenfeld also noted that the book presents those ideas in a very "harsh and inflammatory way."

Finkelstein's response to critics

Finkelstein responded to his critics in the foreword to the second edition (published in 2003), writing: "Mainstream critics allege that I conjured a 'conspiracy theory' while those on the Left ridicule the book as a defense of 'the banks'. None, so far as I can tell, question my actual findings."

Selected publication history

  • 2000; First edition, Verso Books (London) 150 p. Hardcover,
  • 2003; Second edition expanded, Verso Books (London) 286 p. Paperback,

See also

  • Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict
  • Jewish lobby
  • Nazi gold

References

  • Author's web page for the book
  • Review by Tanweer Akram, an economist at Columbia University
  • "The business of death" (Extracted from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G Finkelstein), The Guardian (Wednesday July 12, 2000).
  • "Swiss toll II", (Extracted from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G Finkelstein), The Guardian (Thursday July 13, 2000).