Saudia Flight 163 was a scheduled Saudia passenger flight departing from Quaid-e-Azam Airport in Karachi, Pakistan, bound for Kandara Airport in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, via then-Riyadh International Airport in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which caught fire after takeoff on 19 August 1980. Although the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar made a successful emergency landing at Riyadh, the flight crew failed to perform an emergency evacuation of the airplane, leading to the deaths of all 287 passengers and 14 crew on board the aircraft from smoke inhalation.
The accident is the deadliest aviation disaster involving a Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, and the deadliest to occur in Saudi Arabia. At the time, this was the second-deadliest single-aircraft accident in the history of aviation, after Turkish Airlines Flight 981, and the third-deadliest accident overall, when including the Tenerife airport disaster.
Aircraft
The aircraft involved in the accident was a Lockheed L-1011-200 TriStar, registered in Saudi Arabia as HZ-AHK with serial number 1169. The aircraft was certified on 23 July 1979 and was delivered to Saudia nearly a month later. It had accumulated a total of 3,023 flight hours and 1,759 cycles. HZ-AHK was equipped with three Rolls Royce RB211-524 engines with each having an average of 4,000 total engine hours.
Passengers and crew
{| class="sortable wikitable" align="right" style="margin:0 0 0.5em 1em; "
|+Nationalities of the victims
!Nationality
!Number
|-
| Canada
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| Sweden
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| China
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| Finland
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| France
| style="text-align:center;" |5
|-
| Iran
| style="text-align:center;" |80
|-
| Ireland
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| Japan
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| South Korea
| style="text-align:center;" |4
|-
| Pakistan
| style="text-align:center;" |64
|-
| Philippines
| style="text-align:center;" |6
|-
| Saudi Arabia
| style="text-align:center;" |125
|-
| Taiwan
| style="text-align:center;" |1
|-
| Thailand
| style="text-align:center;" |2
|-
| United Kingdom
| style="text-align:center;" |5
|-
| United States
| style="text-align:center;" |3
|-
!Total
!301
|}
Of the flight's passengers, 82 boarded in Karachi, while the remaining 205 boarded in Riyadh. The majority of the passengers were Saudis and Pakistani religious pilgrims on their way to Mecca. In addition to the Saudis and Pakistanis, 32 religious pilgrims were from Iran. Also, a small number of passengers were from various countries, who were heading to Jeddah for diplomatic missions. Four of the passengers were British.). Previously certified as a captain of the antiquated and comparatively unsophisticated Douglas DC-3, he was hired by Saudia during a major recruitment drive in 1974 and assigned to pilot training for their expanding Boeing 707 and 737 international fleet. He failed to qualify, and consequently, his employment was terminated in May of 1978. He appealed his termination and requested to be considered as a Flight Engineer, and offered to fund his own training. He completed his training and was approved as a 707 Flight Engineer in November 1978. In May 1980, after completing a simulator training course at Lockheed California, he was approved as a Flight Engineer on the TriStar. Curtis may have been dyslexic according to the Saudi official accident report; this may have affected his ability respond correctly to the emergency procedures. Curtis had 650 flying hours as a Flight Engineer, 157 hours of which were on the TriStar.
Six flight attendants were from the Philippines, three were from Pakistan, and one was from the United Kingdom.
Notable passengers
- Sadi Gülçelik, Turkish basketball player, civil engineer and entrepreneur.
Accident
thumb|left|An overview of Saudia Flight 163 after the fire
Flight 163 departed Quaid-e-Azam International Airport (now Jinnah International Airport) in Karachi, Pakistan, at 18:32 Pakistan time (13:32 UTC) bound for Kandara Airport in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a scheduled intermediate stop at Riyadh Airport. The flight arrived in Riyadh at 19:06 Saudi time (16:06 UTC) and had a two-hour layover for refueling. During the layover, several of the passengers disembarked. After refueling, the flight took off at 21:08 (18:08 UTC) bound for Jeddah. After touchdown at 21:36 (18:36 UTC), the airplane continued to a taxiway at the end of the runway where it exited the runway, stopping at 21:39 (18:39 UTC), 2 minutes and 40 seconds after touchdown. The airport fire rescue equipment was stationed back on the landing section of the runway, with emergency personnel expecting an emergency stop and evacuation. This meant they had to rush after the aircraft, which had used the entire length of a runway to slow and then exit onto the taxiway. The airplane stopped facing in the opposite direction from landing. The investigation found no evidence to support this theory. It is assumed that most passengers and flight attendants were incapacitated during the landing roll, or they did not attempt to open a door on a moving aircraft. The aircraft is known to have remained pressurized during the landing roll as the cabin pressurization system was on standby, and the aircraft was found with both pressurization hatches almost completely closed. The pressurization hatches should have opened completely on touchdown to depressurize the aircraft. The crew were found still in their seats, and all the victims were found in the forward half of the fuselage. Autopsies were conducted on some of the non-Saudi nationals, including the American flight engineer. All of them perished from smoke inhalation and not burns, which indicated that they had died long before the R2 door was opened.
Aftermath
thumb|Declassified satellite imagery of showing the burnt-out wreckage of Saudia Flight 163 on 17 July, 1984.
Following the accident, the wreckage of Flight 163 remained in a square perimeter located to the right of runway threshold 19. The engines were also removed. As it was not seen in newer satellite imagery, the aircraft wreckage was likely removed and scrapped sometime in the early 1990s.
Policy changes
After the event, the airline revised its training and emergency procedures. It hired NTSB investigator Robert MacIntosh to improve its safety training and procedures in the aftermath. Lockheed also removed the insulation from above the rear cargo area and added glass laminate structural reinforcement. The US National Transportation Safety Board recommended that aircraft use halomethane extinguishers instead of traditional hand-held fire extinguishers. "In high power-distance cultures, juniors do not question superiors and leaders may be autocratic", leading to situations where a first officer finds it difficult to question decisions made by the captain, conditions that may have been present on Saudia Flight 163. Analysis of the CVR found that a power distance may have taken place, as the captain repeatedly ignored requests from the flight's chief purser to order an evacuation. As the aircraft's CVR stopped recording before the emergency landing due to fire damage, the exact reason for the captain refusing to order an evacuation is unknown, though his behavior and actions during the flight were found to be contributing factors to the accident.
The power distance phenomenon has the capability of affecting flight safety globally, but as the work performed in the cockpit is markedly dependent upon the ability of one worker to crosscheck the work of another and vice versa, the danger is most apparent in individuals brought up in cultures that traditionally revere high power distances between those in positions of power and their subordinates.
In popular culture
In 1982, the British current-affairs program World in Action aired an episode titled "The Mystery of Flight 163". This documented the accident and was subsequently used to train pilots in the value of crew resource management.
The accident was featured in a Season 24 episode of the Canadian documentary series Mayday (Air Disasters in the U.S.), entitled "Under Fire".