Old Norse - WikiHQ

Old Norse was a North Germanic language spoken in Scandinavia and in Norse settlements during the Viking Age and the early Middle Ages (approximately the 8th–14th centuries). It is the conventional term for the medieval West and East Scandinavian dialects (often labelled Old West Norse and Old East Norse) that developed from Proto-Norse and later evolved into the modern North Germanic languages, including Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, Danish, and Swedish.

Old Norse is attested in runic inscriptions (written in the Younger Futhark) and in numerous medieval manuscripts written with the Latin alphabet; its literary corpus includes the Poetic Edda, the Prose Edda, the Icelandic sagas, skaldic verse, law codes, and religious texts. Contact between Old Norse speakers and other languages — particularly Old English and the Celtic languages — left a substantial legacy of loanwords and toponyms; many common English words such as egg, knife, sky, and window derive from Old Norse.

Scholarly usage of the term Old Norse typically covers texts from the 11th to the 14th centuries, Old East Norse was spoken in Denmark, Sweden, Kievan Rus', eastern England, and Danish settlements in Normandy. The Old Gutnish dialect was spoken in Gotland and in various settlements in the East.

In the 11th century, Old Norse was the most widely spoken European language, ranging from Vinland in the West to the Volga River in the East. In Kievan Rus', it survived the longest in Veliky Novgorod, probably lasting into the 13th century there.

Modern descendants

The modern descendants of the Old West Norse dialect are the West Scandinavian languages of Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, and the extinct Norn language of Orkney and Shetland, although Norwegian was heavily influenced by the East dialect, and is today more similar to East Scandinavian (Danish and Swedish) than to Icelandic and Faroese. The descendants of the Old East Norse dialect are the East Scandinavian languages of Danish, Swedish and Övdalian, although Övdalian was heavily influenced by the West Dialect, and is sometimes considered to form its own group.

Among these, the grammar of Icelandic, Faroese and Övdalian have changed the least from Old Norse in the last thousand years, though the pronunciations of Icelandic and Faroese both have changed considerably from Old Norse. With Danish rule of the Faroe Islands, Faroese has also been influenced by Danish.

Both Middle English (especially northern English dialects within the area of the Danelaw) and Early Scots (including Lowland Scots) were strongly influenced by Norse and contained many Old Norse loanwords. Consequently, Modern English (including Scottish English), inherited a significant proportion of its vocabulary directly from Norse.

The development of Norman French was also influenced by Norse. Through Norman, to a smaller extent, so was modern French.

Written modern Icelandic derives from the Old Norse phonemic writing system. Contemporary Icelandic-speakers can read Old Norse, which varies slightly in spelling as well as semantics and word order. However, pronunciation, particularly of the vowel phonemes, has changed at least as much in Icelandic as in the other North Germanic languages.

Faroese retains many similarities but is influenced by Danish, Norwegian, and Gaelic (Scottish and/or Irish). Although Swedish, Danish and Norwegian have diverged the most, they still retain considerable mutual intelligibility. Speakers of modern Swedish, Norwegian and Danish can mostly understand each other without studying their neighboring languages, particularly if speaking slowly. The languages are also sufficiently similar in writing that they can mostly be understood across borders. This could be because these languages have been mutually affected by each other, as well as having a similar development influenced by Middle Low German.

Other influenced languages

Various languages unrelated to Old Norse and others not closely related have been heavily influenced by Norse, particularly the Norman language; to a lesser extent, Finnish and Estonian. Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Lithuanian and Latvian also have a few Norse loanwords. The words Rus and Russia, according to one theory, may be named after the Rus' people, a Norse tribe, probably from present-day east-central Sweden. The current Finnish and Estonian words for Sweden are and , respectively.

A number of loanwords have been introduced into Irish, many associated with fishing and sailing. A similar influence is found in Scottish Gaelic, with over one hundred loanwords estimated to be in the language, many of which are related to fishing and sailing.

Phonology

Vowels

Old Norse vowel phonemes mostly come in pairs of long and short. The standardized orthography marks the long vowels with an acute accent. In medieval manuscripts, it is often unmarked but sometimes marked with an accent or through gemination.

thumb|[[Jackson Crawford speaking Old Norse]]

Old Norse had nasalized versions of all ten vowel qualities. These occurred as allophones of the vowels before nasal consonants and in places where a nasal had followed it in an older form of the word, before it was absorbed into a neighboring sound. If the nasal was absorbed by a stressed vowel, it would also lengthen the vowel. This nasalization also occurred in the other Germanic languages, but were not retained long. They were noted in the First Grammatical Treatise, and otherwise might have remained unknown. The First Grammarian marked these with a dot above the letter. It is also usually thought that a contrastive prosodic feature—generally reconstructed as a pitch or tonal distinction—was already forming either in late Proto-Norse or, at the latest, in early Old Norse, and that it is reflected in the modern Swedish and Norwegian tonal accents (traditionally called Accent 1 and Accent 2). In Danish the modern output of this contrast is, in many varieties, a creaky-voice register called stød.

The emergence of the tonal contrast as a lexical feature is commonly linked to the rise of new disyllabic words due to incorporation of the definite article and vowel epenthesis during the Viking Age and early Middle Ages. However, the precise dating and mechanism of the rise of the contrast remains debated among scholars. Some studies interpret the process as a phonologization of earlier (Proto-Nordic) rhythmic contrasts involving syllable weight, with vowel length changes and the reduction of unstressed syllables resulting in an inherited double-peaked melody during the Viking Age. Others argue for a “peak delay” model of tonal development.

It has been somewhat controversial whether a lexicalised two-way tonal distinction like the one found across much of mainland Norway and Sweden has ever existed in Icelandic, mostly due to the dearth of unambiguous data<!--He redirects to the overview of evidence in favour of its existence Ottósson, Kjartan G. (1986), "Indicier på tonaccentsdistinktion i äldre isländska", Íslenskt mál 8: 183–90. as well as the sceptical conclusion in Í leit að aðgreinandi tónkvæði í íslensku, BA-thesis, Reykjavík:

University of Iceland (2000) by Einar Sigmarsson.-->, although it is often assumed that it did exist and was subsequently lost. It has been argued that evidence of its former existence is preserved, inter alia, in late medieval Icelandic rhyming patterns and in some passages of the Third Grammatical Treatise. For Faroese, older accounts like reported a tonal distinction, although a study led 18 years later, , didn't, ascribing the loss of tones to Danish influence. A more modern report, , described a typical Faroese sentence as with "a smoothly falling melodic curve [...] and clear pronunciation of the ending on the same two-tone level as the preceding stem syllable" standing in stark contrast to "[the] constant rising and falling language melody" found on Suðuroy.

Primary stress in Old Norse falls on the word stem, so that would be pronounced . In compound words, secondary stress falls on the second stem (e.g. , ).

Orthography

Unlike Proto-Norse, which was written with the Elder Futhark, runic Old Norse was originally written with the Younger Futhark, which had only 16 letters. Because of the limited number of runes, several runes were used for different sounds, and long and short vowels were not distinguished in writing. Medieval runes came into use some time later.

As for the Latin alphabet, there was no standardized orthography in use in the Middle Ages. A modified version of the letter wynn called vend was used briefly for the sounds , , and . Long vowels were sometimes marked with acutes but also sometimes left unmarked or geminated. The standardized Old Norse spelling was created in the 19th century and is, for the most part, phonemic. The most notable deviation is that the nonphonemic difference between the voiced and the voiceless dental fricative is marked. The oldest texts and runic inscriptions use þ exclusively. Long vowels are denoted with acutes. Most other letters are written with the same glyph as the IPA phoneme's grapheme, except as shown in the above tables.

Phonological processes

Ablaut

Ablaut patterns are groups of vowels which are swapped, or ablauted, in the nucleus of a word. Strong verbs ablaut the lemma's nucleus to derive the past forms of the verb. This parallels English conjugation, where, e.g., the nucleus of sing becomes sang in the past tense and sung in the past participle. Some verbs are derived by ablaut, as the present-in-past verbs do by consequence of being derived from the past tense forms of strong verbs.

Umlaut

Umlaut or mutation is an assimilatory process acting on vowels preceding a vowel or semivowel of a different vowel backness. In the case of i-umlaut and ʀ-umlaut, this entails a fronting of back vowels, with retention of lip rounding. In the case of u-umlaut, this entails labialization of unrounded vowels. Umlaut is phonemic and in many situations grammatically significant as a side effect of losing the Proto-Germanic morphological suffixes whose vowels created the umlaut allophones.

Some , , , , , , , and all were obtained by i-umlaut from , , , , , , , and respectively. Others were formed via ʀ-umlaut from , , , , and .

OEN often preserves the original value of the vowel directly preceding runic (, ) while OWN receives ʀ-umlaut. Compare runic OEN with OWN (later ), , , .

U-umlaut

U-umlaut is more common in Old West Norse in both phonemic and allophonic positions, while it only occurs sparsely in post-runic Old East Norse and even in runic Old East Norse.

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center"

|+ Comparison demonstrating U-Umlaut in Swedish

! scope="col" rowspan=2 | Meaning

!! scope="col" rowspan=2 | West Old Norse

!! scope="col" rowspan=2 | Old Swedish

!! scope="col" colspan=2 | Modern Swedish

!! scope="col" colspan=2 | Icelandic

! scope="col | Transcription !! scope="col" | IPA

| Guardian / Caretaker || || || || || ||

| Eagle || || || || || ||

| Earth || || || || || ||

| Milk || || || || || ||

: Old Swedish orthography uses to represent both and . The change from Norse to Old Swedish represents only a change in orthography rather than a change in sound. Similarly is used in place of . And thus changes from Norse to Old Swedish to Swedish should be viewed as a change in orthography.

: Represents the u-umlaut found in Swedish.

This is still a major difference in Swedish from Faroese and Icelandic today. Plurals of neuters do not have u-umlaut at all in Swedish, but in Faroese and Icelandic they do. For example, the Faroese and Icelandic plurals of : and respectively, in contrast to Swedish . That also applies to almost all feminine nouns, for example the largest feminine noun group, the o-stem nouns (except the Swedish noun mentioned above), and even i-stem nouns and root nouns, such as Old West Norse (mörk in Icelandic) in comparison with Modern and Old Swedish .

Breaking

Vowel breaking, or fracture, caused a front vowel to be split into a semivowel-vowel sequence before a back vowel in the following syllable. When the accented vowel is short, the ending is dropped.

The nominative of the strong masculine declension and some i-stem feminine nouns uses one such -r (ʀ). () becomes instead of ().

The verb , has third person present tense rather than (). Similarly, the verb had present tense third person (rather than , ) ; while had present tense third person (rather than , ).

The rule is not absolute, with certain counter-examples such as , which has the synonym , yet retains the unabsorbed version, and , where assimilation takes place even though the root vowel, , is short.

The clusters */Clʀ, Csʀ, Cnʀ, Crʀ/ cannot yield respectively, instead . The effect of this shortening can result in the lack of distinction between some forms of the noun. In the case of , the nominative and accusative singular and plural forms are identical. The nominative singular and nominative and accusative plural would otherwise have been , . These forms are impossible because the cluster */Crʀ/ cannot be realized as , nor as */Crʀ/, nor as */Cʀː/. The same shortening as in also occurs in = (as opposed to , ), (as opposed to , ), and (as opposed to , ).

Furthermore, wherever the cluster */rʀ/ is expected to exist, such as in the male names , (supposedly , ), the result is apparently always rather than */rʀ/ or */ʀː/. This is observable in the Runic corpus.

Phonotactics

Blocking of ii, uu

In Old Norse, adjacent to , , their u-umlauts, and was not possible, nor adjacent to , , their i-umlauts, and . Some words, such as , have multiple genders, evidenced by their determiners being declined in different genders within a given sentence.

Morphology

Nouns, adjectives, and pronouns were declined in four grammatical casesnominative, accusative, genitive, and dativein singular and plural numbers. Adjectives and pronouns were additionally declined in three grammatical genders. Some pronouns (first and second person) could have dual number in addition to singular and plural. The genitive was used partitively and in compounds and kennings (e.g., , ; , ).

There were several classes of nouns within each gender. The following is an example of the "strong" inflectional paradigms:

{| class="wikitable"

|+ The strong masculine noun ,

! Singular

! Plural

| rowspan="2" |

| /

{| class="wikitable"

|+ The feminine noun (OWN), (OEN),

! colspan="2" |

! Old West Norse

! Old East Norse

! rowspan="2" | -

! Singular

! Plural

! rowspan="2" |

! Singular

| colspan="2" style="text-align: center" |

! Plural

| colspan="2" style="text-align: center" |

! rowspan="2" |

! Singular

! Plural

{| class="wikitable"

|+ The neuter noun ,

! Singular

! Plural

! -

| colspan="2" style="text-align: center" |

The numerous "weak" noun paradigms had a much higher degree of syncretism between the different cases : i.e. they had fewer forms than the "strong" nouns.

A definite article was appended as a suffix that retained an independent declension : e.g., – , – , – . This definite article, however, was a separate word and did not become attached to the noun before later stages of the Old Norse period.

Texts

The earliest inscriptions in Old Norse are runic, from the 8th century. Runes continued to be commonly used until the 15th century and have been recorded to be in use in some form as late as the 19th century in some parts of Sweden. With the conversion to Christianity in the 11th century came the Latin alphabet. The oldest preserved texts in Old Norse in the Latin alphabet date from the middle of the 12th century. Subsequently, Old Norse became the vehicle of a large and varied body of vernacular literature. Most of the surviving literature was written in Iceland. Best known are the Norse sagas, the Icelanders' sagas and the mythological literature, but there also survives a large body of religious literature, translations into Old Norse of courtly romances, classical mythology, and the Old Testament, as well as instructional material, grammatical treatises and a large body of letters and official documents.

Dialects

Most of the innovations that appeared in Old Norse spread evenly through the Old Norse area. As a result, the dialects were similar and considered to be the same language, a language that they sometimes called the Danish tongue (), sometimes Norse language (), as evidenced in the following two quotes from by Snorri Sturluson:

However, some changes were geographically limited and so created a dialectal difference between Old West Norse and Old East Norse.

As Proto-Norse evolved into Old Norse, in the 8th century, the effects of the umlauts seem to have been very much the same over the whole Old Norse area. But in later dialects of the language a split occurred mainly between west and east as the use of umlauts began to vary. The typical umlauts (for example < ) were better preserved in the West due to later generalizations in the east where many instances of umlaut were removed (many archaic Eastern texts as well as eastern runic inscriptions however portray the same extent of umlauts as in later Western Old Norse).

All the while, the changes resulting in breaking (for example < ) were more influential in the East probably once again due to generalizations within the inflectional system. This difference was one of the greatest reasons behind the dialectalization that took place in the 9th and 10th centuries, shaping an Old West Norse dialect in Norway and the Atlantic settlements and an Old East Norse dialect in Denmark and Sweden.

Old West Norse and Old Gutnish did not take part in the monophthongization which changed () into , () and into , nor did certain peripheral dialects of Swedish, as seen in modern Ostrobothnian dialects. Another difference was that Old West Norse lost certain combinations of consonants. The combinations , , and were assimilated into , and in Old West Norse, but this phenomenon was limited in Old East Norse.

Here is a comparison between the two dialects as well as Old Gutnish. It is a transcription from one of the Funbo Runestones in Sweden (U 990) from the eleventh century:

The OEN original text above is transliterated according to traditional scholarly methods, wherein u-umlaut is not regarded in runic Old East Norse. Modern studies have shown that the positions where it applies are the same as for runic Old West Norse. An alternative and probably more accurate transliteration would therefore render the text in OEN as such:

Some past participles and other words underwent i-umlaut in Old West Norse but not in Old East Norse dialects. Examples of that are Icelandic / and /, which in Swedish are / and /. This can also be seen in the Icelandic and Norwegian words and , which in Swedish is as in Old Swedish. These differences can also be seen in comparison between Norwegian and Swedish.

Old West Norse

Old West Norse is by far the best attested variety of Old Norse. The term Old Norse is often used to refer to Old West Norse specifically, in which case the broader subject receives another name, such as Old Scandinavian. Another designation is Old West Nordic.

The combinations , , and mostly merged to , and in Old West Norse around the 7th century, marking the first distinction between the Eastern and Western dialects. The following table illustrates this:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center"

! English !! Old West Norse !! Old East Norse !! Proto-Norse

| mushroom || || ||

| steep || || ||

| widow || || ||

| to shrink || || ||

| to sprint || || ||

| to sink || || ||

An early difference between Old West Norse and the other dialects was that Old West Norse had the forms , and 'faith', whereas Old East Norse , and . Old West Norse was also characterized by the preservation of u-umlaut, which meant that, for example, Proto-Norse , became and not as in post-runic Old East Norse ; OWN and runic OEN , while post-runic OEN .

The earliest body of text appears in runic inscriptions and in poems composed by Þjóðólfr of Hvinir (although the poems are not preserved in contemporary sources, but only in much later manuscripts). The earliest manuscripts are from the period 1150–1200 and concern legal, religious and historical matters. During the 12th and 13th centuries, Trøndelag and Western Norway were the most important areas of the Norwegian kingdom and they shaped Old West Norse as an archaic language with a rich set of declensions. In the body of text that has survived into the modern day from until , Old West Norse had little dialect variation, and Old Icelandic does not diverge much more than the Old Norwegian dialects do from each other.

Old Norwegian differentiated early from Old Icelandic by the loss of the consonant h in initial position before l, n and r; thus whereas Old Icelandic manuscripts might use the form , Old Norwegian manuscripts might use .

From the late 13th century, Old Icelandic and Old Norwegian started to diverge more. After , the Black Death and following social upheavals seem to have accelerated language changes in Norway. From the late 14th century, the language used in Norway is generally referred to as Middle Norwegian.

Old West Norse underwent a lengthening of initial vowels at some point, especially in Norwegian, so that OWN became , ONW > , OIC > .

Old Icelandic

In Iceland, initial before was lost: compare Icelandic with Danish , OEN . The change is shared with Old Gutnish.

A specifically Icelandic sound, the long, u-umlauted A, spelled and pronounced , developed around the early 11th century. Thus, pre-13th-century (with ) 'green' became spelled as in modern Icelandic (with ). The 12th-century Gray Goose Laws manuscripts distinguish the vowels, and so does the Codex Regius copy.

Towards the end of the 13th century, () merged to ().

Old Norwegian

Around the 11th century, Old Norwegian , , and became , and . It is debatable whether the sequences represented a consonant cluster () or devoicing ().

Orthographic evidence suggests that in a confined dialect of Old Norwegian, may have been unrounded before and that u-umlaut was reversed unless the u had been eliminated: , > , .

Greenlandic Norse

This dialect of Old West Norse was spoken by Icelandic colonies in Greenland. When the colonies died out around the 15th century, the dialect went with it. The phoneme and some instances of merged to and so Old Icelandic became .

Text example

The following text is from , an Alexander Romance. The manuscript, AM 519 a 4to, is dated . The facsimile demonstrates the sigla used by scribes to write Old Norse. Many of them were borrowed from Latin. Without familiarity with these abbreviations, the facsimile will be unreadable to many. In addition, reading the manuscript itself requires familiarity with the letterforms of the native script. The abbreviations are expanded in a version with normalized spelling like that of the standard normalization system. Compared to the spelling of the same text in Modern Icelandic, pronunciation has changed greatly, but spelling has changed little since Icelandic orthography was intentionally modelled after Old Norse in the 19th century.

{| class=wikitable

! scope="col" | Digital facsimile of the manuscript text

! scope="col" | The same text with normalized spelling

! scope="col" | The same text with Modern Icelandic spelling

<nowiki>*</nowiki> a printed in uncial. Uncials not encoded separately in Unicode as of this section's writing.

Old East Norse

upright=1.1|thumb|right|The [[Rök runestone in Östergötland, Sweden, is the longest surviving source of early Old East Norse. It is inscribed on both sides.]]

Old East Norse or Old East Nordic between 800 and 1100 is called Runic Swedish in Sweden and Runic Danish in Denmark, but for geographical rather than linguistic reasons. Any differences between the two were minute at best during the more ancient stages of this dialect group. Changes had a tendency to occur earlier in the Danish region. Even today many Old Danish changes have still not taken place in modern Swedish. Swedish is therefore the more conservative of the two in both the ancient and the modern languages, sometimes by a profound margin. The language is called "runic" because the body of text appears in runes.

Runic Old East Norse is characteristically conservative in form, especially Swedish (which is still true for modern Swedish compared to Danish). In essence it matches or surpasses the conservatism of post-runic Old West Norse, which in turn is generally more conservative than post-runic Old East Norse. While typically "Eastern" in structure, many later post-runic changes and trademarks of OEN had yet to happen.

The phoneme ʀ, which evolved during the Proto-Norse period from z, was still clearly separated from r in most positions, even when being geminated, while in OWN it had already merged with r.

The Proto-Germanic phoneme */w/ was preserved in initial sounds in Old East Norse (w-), unlike in West Norse where it developed into . It survived in rural Swedish dialects in the provinces of Westro- and North Bothnia, Skåne, Blekinge, Småland, Halland, Västergötland and south of Bohuslän into the 18th, 19th and 20th century. It is still preserved in the Dalecarlian dialects in the province of Dalarna, Sweden, and in Jutlandic dialects in Denmark. The -phoneme did also occur after consonants (kw-, tw-, sw- etc.) in Old East Norse and did so into modern times in said Swedish dialects and in a number of others. Generally, the initial w-sound developed into in dialects earlier than after consonants where it survived much longer.

In summation, the -sound survived in the East Nordic tongues almost a millennium longer than in the West Norse counterparts, and does still subsist at the present.

Monophthongization of > and > started in mid-10th-century Denmark. Compare runic OEN: , , , , ; with Post-runic OEN: , , , , ; OWN: , , , , ; from PN , , , + , .

Feminine o-stems often preserve the plural ending , while in OWN they more often merge with the feminine i-stems: (runic OEN) , , , versus OWN , and (Danish has mainly lost the distinction between the two stems, with both endings now being rendered as or alternatively for the o-stems ; modern Swedish , , ).

Vice versa, masculine i-stems with the root ending in either or tended to shift the plural ending to that of the ja-stems while OEN kept the original: , and versus OWN , and (modern Danish , , ; modern Swedish , , ).

The plural ending of ja-stems were mostly preserved while those of OWN often acquired that of the i-stems: , , versus OWN , bekkir, (modern Swedish , , ).

Old Danish

Until the early 12th century, Old East Norse was very much a uniform dialect. It was in Denmark that the first innovations appeared that would differentiate Old Danish from Old Swedish () as these innovations spread north unevenly (unlike the earlier changes that spread more evenly over the East Norse area), creating a series of isoglosses going from Zealand to Svealand.

In Old Danish, merged with during the 9th century. From the 11th to 14th centuries, the unstressed vowels -a, -o and -e (standard normalization -a, -u and -i) started to merge into a single central vowel, represented with the letter , which also came from widespread epenthesis, occurring particularly before -ʀ endings. At the same time, the voiceless stop consonants p, t and k became voiced plosives and even fricative consonants. Resulting from these innovations, Danish has (cake), (tongues) and (guests) whereas (Standard) Swedish has retained older forms, , and (OEN , , ).

Moreover, the Danish pitch accent shared with Norwegian and Swedish changed into stød around this time.

Old Swedish

At the end of the 10th and early 11th century initial h- before l, n and r was still preserved in the middle and northern parts of Sweden, and is sporadically still preserved in some northern dialects as g-, e.g. , from . The Dalecarlian dialects developed independently from Old Swedish and as such can be considered separate languages from Swedish.

Text example

This is an extract from , the Westrogothic law. It is the oldest text written as a manuscript found in Sweden and from the 13th century. It is contemporaneous with most of the Icelandic literature. The text marks the beginning of Old Swedish as a distinct dialect.

Old Gutnish

Due to Gotland's early isolation from the mainland, many features of Old Norse did not spread from or to the island, and Old Gutnish developed as an entirely separate branch from Old East and West Norse. For example, the diphthong in , and was not subject to anticipatory assimilation to as in e.g. Old Icelandic , and . Gutnish also shows dropping of in initial , which it shares with the Old West Norse dialects (except Old East Norwegian), but which is otherwise abnormal. Breaking was also particularly active in Old Gutnish, leading to e.g. versus mainland .

Text example

The is the longest text surviving from Old Gutnish. Appended to it is a short texting dealing with the history of the Gotlanders. This part relates to the agreement that the Gotlanders had with the Swedish king sometime before the 9th century:

Relationship to other languages

Relationship to English

Old English and Old Norse were related languages. It is therefore not surprising that many words in Old Norse look familiar to English speakers : e.g., , , , , , . This is because both English and Old Norse stem from a Proto-Germanic mother language. In addition, numerous common, everyday Old Norse words were adopted into the Old English language during the Viking Age. A few examples of Old Norse loanwords in modern English are (English/Viking Age Old East Norse):

Nouns – anger (), bag (), bait (, , ), band (), bark (, stem ), birth (), dirt (), dregs (), egg (, related to cognate which became /), fellow (), gap (), husband (), cake (), keel (, stem also , ), kid (), knife (), law (, stem ), leg (), link (), loan (, related to OE. cognate , cf. lend), race (, stem ), root (, related to OE. cognate , cf. wort), sale (), scrap (), seat (), sister (, related to OE. cognate ), skill (/), skin (), skirt ( vs. the native English shirt of the same root), sky (), slaughter (), snare (), steak (), thrift (), tidings (), trust (), window (), wing ()
Verbs – are (, displacing OE ), blend (), call (), cast (), clip (), crawl (), cut (possibly from ON ), die (), gasp (), get (), give (/, related to OE. cognate ), glitter (), hit (), lift (), raise (), ransack (), rid (), run (, stem , related to OE. cognate ), scare (), scrape (), seem (), sprint (), take (), thrive (), thrust (), want ()
Adjectives – flat (), happy (), ill (), likely (), loose (), low (), meek (), odd (), rotten (/), scant (), sly (), weak (), wrong ()
Adverbs – thwart/athwart ()
Prepositions – till (), fro ()
Conjunction – though/tho ()
Interjection – hail (), wassail ()
Personal pronoun – they (), their (), them () (for which the Anglo-Saxons said , , )
Prenominal adjectives – same ()

In a simple sentence like 'They are both weak', the extent of the Old Norse loanwords becomes quite clear; compare Old East Norse with archaic pronunciation: with . The words "they" and "weak" are both borrowed from Old Norse, and the word "both" might also be a borrowing, though this is disputed (cf. German ). While the number of loanwords adopted from the Norse was not as numerous as that of Norman French or Latin, their depth and everyday nature make them a substantial and very important part of everyday English speech as they are part of the very core of the modern English vocabulary.

Tracing the origins of words like "bull" and "Thursday" is more difficult. "Bull" may derive from either or , while "Thursday" may be a borrowing or simply derive from the , which could have been influenced by the Old Norse cognate. The word "are" is from /, which stems back to Proto-Germanic as well as the Old Norse cognates.

Relationship to modern Scandinavian languages

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"

|+ Development of Old Norse vowels to the modern Scandinavian languages

! Old Norse !! Modern Icelandic !! Modern Faroese !! Modern Swedish !! Modern Danish !! Examples

| || ; || || ON : Ic/Fa tíð, Sw/Da/No tid

| > || || ; ; (+r) ; || || ON : Ic/Fa dyr, Sw , Da/No dør ON : Ic/Fa/NN/Sw fylla, Da , No

| ||