thumb|upright=2|Diagram of an instrument landing system (ILS) approach
In aviation, the instrument landing system (ILS) is a precision radio navigation system that provides short-range guidance to aircraft to allow them to approach a runway at night or in bad weather. In its original form, it allows a pilot, through a cockpit mounted instrument in the aircraft that displays lateral and vertical guidance indications (needles),, to approach until the aircraft is over the ground, within of the runway. At that point the runway should be visible to the pilot; if it is not, they perform a missed approach. Bringing the aircraft this close to the runway dramatically increases the range of weather conditions in which a safe landing can be made. Other versions of the system, or "categories", have further reduced the minimum altitudes, runway visual ranges (RVRs), and transmitter and monitoring configurations designed depending on the normal expected weather patterns and airport safety requirements.
300px|thumb|View of the primary component of the ILS, the [[localizer, which provides lateral guidance. The transmitter and antenna are on the centerline at the opposite end of the runway from the approach threshold. Photo of Indra's Normarc localizer, taken at the runway 06R of the Montréal–Trudeau International Airport, Canada.]]
ILS uses two directional radio signals, the localizer (108 to 112 MHz frequency), which provides horizontal guidance, and the glideslope (329.15 to 335 MHz frequency) for vertical guidance. The relationship between the aircraft's position and these signals is displayed on an aircraft instrument, often as additional pointers in the attitude indicator. The pilot attempts to maneuver the aircraft to keep the indicators centered while they approach the runway to the decision height. Optional marker beacon(s) provide distance information as the approach proceeds, including the middle marker (MM), placed close to the position of the (CAT 1) decision height. Markers are largely being phased out and replaced by distance measuring equipment (DME).
To aid the transition from instrument landing to visual, lighting on the runway is often extended towards the decision point using a series of high-intensity lights known as the approach lighting system.
History of precision approach landing systems
A number of radio-based landing systems were developed between the 1920s and 1940s, notably the Lorenz beam, which was a blind-landing radio navigation system developed by C. Lorenz AG for bad weather landing, which saw relatively wide use in Europe and was also installed on a number of airports on other continents worldwide prior to World War II. Later also the patent for adding vertical guidance like in today's ILS was awarded.
The US-developed SCS-51 system provided a better accuracy for vertical and horizontal guidance. Many sets were installed at airbases in the United Kingdom during World War II. After the formation of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in 1947, ILS was selected as the first international standard precision approach system and was published in ICAO Annex 10 in 1950. Further development enabled ILS systems to provide up to CAT-III approaches. and this may lead to the eventual removal of ILS at most airports.
ILS therefore remains the only available precision approach systems supported by all IFR equipped civil aircraft.
Principle of operation
thumb|ILS planes
An instrument landing system operates as a ground-based instrument approach system that provides precision lateral and vertical guidance to an aircraft approaching and landing on a runway, using a combination of radio signals and, in many cases, high-intensity lighting arrays to enable a safe landing during instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), such as low ceilings or reduced visibility due to fog, rain, or blowing snow.
Beam systems
Previous blind landing radio aids typically took the form of beam systems of various types. These normally consisted of a radio transmitter that was connected to a motorized switch to produce a pattern of Morse code dots and dashes. The switch also controlled which of two directional antennae the signal was sent to. The resulting signal sent into the air consists of dots sent to one side of the runway and dashes to the other. The beams were wide enough so they overlapped in the center.
To use the system an aircraft only needed a conventional radio receiver. As they approached the airport they would tune in the signal and listen to it in their headphones. They would hear dots and dashes (Morse code "A" or "N"), if they were to the side of the runway, or if they were properly aligned, the two mixed together to produce a steady tone, the equisignal. The accuracy of this measurement was highly dependent on the skill of the operator, who listened to the signal on earphones in a noisy aircraft, often while communicating with the tower.
Although the encoding scheme is complex, and requires a considerable amount of ground equipment, the resulting signal is both far more accurate than the older beam-based systems and is far more resistant to common forms of interference. For instance, static in the signal will affect both sub-signals equally, so it will have no effect on the result. Similarly, changes in overall signal strength as the aircraft approaches the runway, or changes due to fading, will have little effect on the resulting measurement because they would normally affect both channels equally. The system is subject to multipath distortion effects due to the use of multiple frequencies, but because those effects are dependent on the terrain, they are generally fixed in location and can be accounted for through adjustments in the antenna or phase shifters.
The glideslope works in the same general fashion as the localizer and uses the same encoding, but is normally transmitted to produce a centerline at an angle of 3 degrees above horizontal from an antenna beside the runway instead of the end. The only difference between the signals is that the localizer is transmitted using lower carrier frequencies, using 40 selected channels between 108.10 MHz and 111.95 MHz, whereas the glideslope has a corresponding set of 40 channels between 328.6 and 335.4 MHz. The higher frequencies generally result in the glideslope radiating antennas being smaller. The channel pairs are not linear; localizer channel 1 is at 108.10 and paired with glideslope at 334.70, whereas channel two is 108.15 and 334.55. There are gaps and jumps through both bands.
thumb|Common type of illustration showing misleading examples of ILS localizer and glideslope emissions
Many illustrations of the ILS concept show the system operating more similarly to beam systems with the 90 Hz signal on one side and the 150 on the other. These illustrations are inaccurate; both signals are radiated across the entire beam pattern, it is their relative difference in the depth of modulation (DDM) that changes dependent upon the position of the approaching aircraft.
Using ILS
An instrument approach procedure chart (or 'approach plate') is published for each ILS approach to provide the information needed to fly an ILS approach during instrument flight rules (IFR) operations. A chart includes the radio frequencies used by the ILS components or navaids and the prescribed minimum visibility requirements.
An aircraft approaching a runway is guided by the ILS receivers in the aircraft by performing modulation depth comparisons. Many aircraft can route signals into the autopilot to fly the approach automatically. An ILS consists of two independent sub-systems. The localizer provides lateral guidance; the glide slope provides vertical guidance.
Localizer
thumb|The localizer station for runway 27R at [[Hannover Airport in Germany]]
A localizer (LOC, or LLZ until ICAO standardisation) is an antenna array normally located beyond the departure end of the runway and generally consists of several pairs of directional antennas.
The localizer will allow the aircraft to turn and match the aircraft with the runway. After that, the pilots will activate approach phase (APP). <!--
If there is a predominance of either 90 Hz or 150 Hz modulation, the aircraft is off the centreline. In the cockpit, the needle on the instrument part of the ILS (the omni-bearing indicator (nav indicator), horizontal situation indicator (HSI), or course deviation indicator (CDI)) shows that the aircraft needs to fly left or right to correct the error to fly toward the centre of the runway. If the DDM is zero, the aircraft is on the LOC centreline coinciding with the physical runway centreline. The pilot controls the aircraft so that the indicator remains centered on the display (i.e. it provides lateral guidance). Full-scale deflection of the instrument corresponds to a DDM of 15.5%.-->
Glide slope (G/S)
thumb|Glide slope station for runway 09R at [[Hannover-Langenhagen Airport|Hannover Airport in Germany]]
thumb|Given this display, the pilot must correct to the left and a little upwards.
The pilot controls the aircraft so that the glide slope indicator remains centered on the display to ensure the aircraft is following the glide path of approximately 3° above horizontal (ground level) to remain above obstructions and reach the runway at the proper touchdown point (i.e. it provides vertical guidance).
Limitations
Due to the complexity of ILS localizer and glide slope systems, there are some limitations. Localizer systems are sensitive to obstructions in the signal broadcast area, such as large buildings or hangars. Glide slope systems are also limited by the terrain in front of the glide slope antennas. If terrain is sloping or uneven, reflections can create an uneven glidepath, causing unwanted needle deflections. Additionally, since the ILS signals are pointed in one direction by the positioning of the arrays, glide slope supports only straight-line approaches with a constant angle of descent. Installation of an ILS can be costly because of siting criteria and the complexity of the antenna system.
ILS critical areas and ILS sensitive areas are established to avoid hazardous reflections that would affect the radiated signal. The location of these critical areas can prevent aircraft from using certain taxiways leading to delays in takeoffs, increased hold times, and increased separation between aircraft.
Variant
- Instrument guidance system (IGS) (localizer type directional aid (LDA) in the United States) – a modified ILS to accommodate a non-straight approach; the most famous example was for the approach to runway 13 at Kai Tak Airport, Hong Kong.
- Instrument carrier landing system (ICLS) – a modified ILS for (aircraft) carrier landing.
Identification
In addition to the previously mentioned navigational signals, the localizer provides for ILS facility identification by periodically transmitting a 1,020 Hz Morse code identification signal, that always starts with Morse Code letter "I", for ILS, two dots. For example, the ILS for runway 4R at John F. Kennedy International Airport transmits IJFK to identify itself, while runway 4L is known as IHIQ. This lets users know the facility is operating normally and that they are tuned to the correct ILS. The glide slope station transmits no identification signal, so ILS equipment relies on the localizer for identification.
Monitoring
It is essential that any failure of the ILS to provide safe guidance be detected immediately by the pilot. To achieve this, monitors continually assess the vital characteristics of the transmissions. If any significant deviation beyond strict limits is detected, either the ILS is automatically switched off or the navigation and identification components are removed from the carrier. Either of these actions will activate an indication ('failure flag') on the instruments of an aircraft using the ILS.
Localizer back course
Modern localizer antennas are highly directional. However, usage of older, less directional antennas allows a runway to have a non-precision approach called a localizer back course. This lets aircraft land using the signal transmitted from the back of the localizer array. Highly directional antennas do not provide a sufficient signal to support a back course. In the United States, back course approaches are typically associated with Category I systems at smaller airports that do not have an ILS on both ends of the primary runway. Pilots flying a back course should disregard any glide slope indication.
Marker beacons
On some legacy installations, marker beacons operating at a carrier frequency of 75 MHz are provided. When the transmission from a marker beacon is received it activates an indicator on the pilot's instrument panel and the identity code and tone of the beacon is audible to the pilot. The distance from the runway at which this indication should be received is published in the documentation for that approach, together with the height at which the aircraft should be if correctly established on the ILS. This provides a check on the correct function of the glide slope. Instead of marker beacons, modern ILS installations use DME. Co-located with the ILS glidepath transmitter near the touchdown point, the DME provides a display of aircraft distance to the runway.
<!-- ==
Outer marker
frame|left|blue outer marker
The outer marker is normally located from the threshold, except that where this distance is not practical, the outer marker may be located between from the threshold. The modulation is repeated Morse-style dashes of a 400 Hz tone (--) ("M"). The cockpit indicator is a blue lamp that flashes in unison with the received audio code. The purpose of this beacon is to provide height, distance, and equipment functioning checks to aircraft on intermediate and final approach. In the United States, a NDB is often combined with the outer marker beacon in the ILS approach (called a Locator Outer Marker, or LOM). In Canada, low-powered NDBs have replaced marker beacons entirely.
Middle marker
frame|left|amber middle marker
The middle marker should be located so as to indicate, in low visibility conditions, the missed approach point, and the point that visual contact with the runway is imminent, ideally at a distance of approximately from the threshold. The modulation is repeated alternating Morse-style dots and dashes of a 1.3 kHz tone at the rate of two per second (·-·-) ("Ä" or "AA"). The cockpit indicator is an amber lamp that flashes in unison with the received audio code. In the United States, middle markers are not required so many of them have been decommissioned.
Inner marker
frame|left|white inner marker
The inner marker, when installed, shall be located so as to indicate in low visibility conditions the imminence of arrival at the runway threshold. This is typically the position of an aircraft on the ILS as it reaches Category II minimums, ideally at a distance of approximately from the threshold. The modulation is repeated Morse-style dots at 3 kHz (····) ("H"). The cockpit indicator is a white lamp that flashes in unison with the received audio code.
== -->
DME substitution
Distance measuring equipment (DME) provides pilots with a slant range measurement of distance to the runway. DMEs are augmenting or replacing markers in many installations. The DME provides more accurate and continuous monitoring of correct progress on the ILS glide slope to the pilot, and does not require an installation outside the airport boundary. When used in conjunction with a dual runway approach ILS, the DME is often sited midway between the reciprocal runway thresholds with the internal delay modified so that one unit can provide distance information to either runway threshold. For approaches where a DME is specified in lieu of marker beacons, DME required is noted on the instrument approach procedure and the aircraft must have at least one operating DME unit, or an IFR-approved system using a GNSS (an RNAV system meeting TSO-C129/ -C145/-C146), to begin the approach.
Compass locator
Compass locators are low-powered (less than 25 W) non-directional beacons and are received and indicated by the automatic direction finder receiver. It ranges over 15 miles and operate between 190 and 535 kHz. When used in conjunction with an ILS front course, the compass locator facilities are collocated with the outer and/or middle marker facilities and can be used to substitute an outer marker, in which case it will transmit at 400 W. The coding identification of the outer locator consists of the first two letters of the three-letter identifier of the associated localizer.
Approach lighting
thumb|[[Odate–Noshiro Airport|Odate-Noshiro Airport approach lighting system.]]
Some installations include medium- or high-intensity approach light systems (abbreviated ALS). Most often, these are at larger airports but many small general aviation airports in the U.S. have approach lights to support their ILS installations and obtain low-visibility minimums. The ALS assists the pilot in transitioning from instrument to visual flight, and to align the aircraft visually with the runway centerline. Pilot observation of the approach lighting system at the Decision Altitude allows the pilot to continue descending towards the runway, even if the runway or runway lights cannot be seen, since the ALS counts as runway end environment. In the U.S., an ILS without approach lights may have CAT I ILS visibility minimums as low as (runway visual range of ) if the required obstacle clearance surfaces are clear of obstructions.
thumb|Approach lighting system at [[Aurel Vlaicu International Airport.]]
Visibility minimums of (runway visual range of ) are possible with a CAT I ILS approach supported by a ALS, and visibility visual range is possible if the runway has high-intensity edge lights, touchdown zone and centerline lights, and an ALS that is at least long (see Table 3-3-1 "Minimum visibility values" in FAA Order 8260.3C). In effect, ALS extends the runway environment out towards the landing aircraft and allows low-visibility operations. CAT II and III ILS approaches generally require complex high-intensity approach light systems, while medium-intensity systems are usually paired with CAT I ILS approaches. At some non-towered airports, the pilot controls the lighting system; for example, the pilot can key the microphone seven times to turn on the lights on the high intensity, five times to medium intensity or three times for low intensity.
Decision altitude and height
Once established on an approach, the pilot follows the ILS approach path indicated by the localizer and descends along the glide path to the decision height. This is the height at which the pilot must have adequate visual reference to the landing environment (e.g. approach or runway lighting) to decide whether to continue the descent to a landing; otherwise, the pilot must execute a missed approach procedure, then try the same approach again, try a different approach, or divert to another airport. Usually, the decision on whether or not the pilot continues with the approach relies on whether the runway is visible or not, or if the runway is clear or not.
ILS categories
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Precision instrument approach and landing categories (ICAO/FAA)
|-
! Category
! Decision height
! Runway visual range (RVR)
|-
! I
| >200ft (60m)
| > 550m (1,800ft) or >1,200ft (350m)
|-
! III A
| <100ft (30m)
| >700ft (200m)
|-
! III B
| <50ft (15m)
| 150–700ft (50–200m)
|-
! III C