Fermi–Dirac statistics is a type of quantum statistics that applies to the physics of a system consisting of many non-interacting, identical particles that obey the Pauli exclusion principle. A result is the Fermi–Dirac distribution of particles over energy states. It is named after Enrico Fermi and Paul Dirac, each of whom derived the distribution independently in 1926. It was also difficult to understand why the emission currents generated by applying high electric fields to metals at room temperature were almost independent of temperature.

The difficulty encountered by the Drude model, the electronic theory of metals at that time, was due to considering that electrons were (according to classical statistics theory) all equivalent. In other words, it was believed that each electron contributed to the specific heat an amount on the order of the Boltzmann constant&nbsp;k<sub>B</sub>.

This problem remained unsolved until the development of Fermi–Dirac statistics.

Fermi–Dirac statistics was first published in 1926 by Enrico Fermi and Paul Dirac. According to Max Born, Pascual Jordan developed in 1925 the same statistics, which he called Pauli statistics, but it was not published in a timely manner. According to Dirac, it was first studied by Fermi, and Dirac called it "Fermi statistics" and the corresponding particles "fermions".

Fermi–Dirac statistics was applied in 1926 by Ralph Fowler to describe the collapse of a star to a white dwarf. In 1927 Arnold Sommerfeld applied it to electrons in metals and developed the free electron model, and in 1928 Fowler and Lothar Nordheim applied it to field electron emission from metals. Fermi–Dirac statistics continue to be an important part of physics.

Fermi–Dirac distribution

For a system of identical fermions in thermodynamic equilibrium, the average number of fermions in a single-particle state is given by the Fermi–Dirac (F–D) distribution:

where is the Boltzmann constant, is the absolute temperature, is the energy of the single-particle state , and is the total chemical potential. The distribution is normalized by the condition

<math display="block">\sum_i \bar n_i = N</math>

that can be used to express <math>\mu = \mu(T, N)</math> in that <math>\mu</math> can assume either a positive or negative value.

At zero absolute temperature, is equal to the Fermi energy plus the potential energy per fermion, provided it is in a neighbourhood of positive spectral density. In the case of a spectral gap, such as for electrons in a semiconductor, the point of symmetry is typically called the Fermi level or—for electrons—the electrochemical potential, and will be located in the middle of the gap.

The Fermi–Dirac distribution is only valid if the number of fermions in the system is large enough so that adding one more fermion to the system has negligible effect on . Since the Fermi–Dirac distribution was derived using the Pauli exclusion principle, which allows at most one fermion to occupy each possible state, a result is that <math>0 < \bar{n}_i < 1</math>.

<gallery class="center" widths="400" heights="300" caption="Fermi–Dirac distribution">

File:Fermi dirac distribution.png|Energy dependence. More gradual at higher T. Not shown is that <math>\mu</math> decreases for higher T.

File:Fermi dirac number above.png|Temperature dependence for <math>\varepsilon > \mu</math>.

</gallery>

The variance of the number of particles in state i can be calculated from the above expression for <math>\bar{n}_i</math>:

<math display="block"> V(n_i) = k_\text{B}T \frac{\partial}{\partial \mu} \bar{n}_i = \bar{n}_i(1 - \bar{n}_i).</math>

Distribution of particles over energy

thumb|500px|Fermi function <math>F(\epsilon)</math> with <math>\mu = 0.55~\text{eV}</math> for various temperatures in the range <math>2~\text{K} \leq T \leq 375~\text{K}</math>

From the Fermi–Dirac distribution of particles over states, one can find the distribution of particles over energy. The average number of fermions with energy <math>\varepsilon_i</math> can be found by multiplying the Fermi–Dirac distribution <math>\bar{n}_i</math> by the degeneracy <math>g_i</math> (i.e. the number of states with energy <math>\varepsilon_i</math>),

<math display="block">\begin{align}

\bar{n}(\varepsilon_i) &= g_i \bar{n}_i \\

&= \frac{g_i}{e^{(\varepsilon_i - \mu) / k_\text{B} T} + 1}.

\end{align}</math>

When <math>g_i \ge 2</math>, it is possible that <math>\bar{n}(\varepsilon_i) > 1</math>, since there is more than one state that can be occupied by fermions with the same energy <math>\varepsilon_i</math>.

When a quasi-continuum of energies <math>\varepsilon</math> has an associated density of states <math>g(\varepsilon)</math> (i.e. the number of states per unit energy range per unit volume), the average number of fermions per unit energy range per unit volume is

<math display="block">\bar{\mathcal{N(\varepsilon) = g(\varepsilon) F(\varepsilon),</math>

where <math>F(\varepsilon)</math> is called the Fermi function and is the same function that is used for the Fermi–Dirac distribution <math>\bar{n}_i</math>:

<math display="block">F(\varepsilon) = \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon - \mu) / k_\text{B}T} + 1},</math>

so that

<math display="block">\bar{\mathcal{N(\varepsilon) = \frac{g(\varepsilon)}{e^{(\varepsilon - \mu) / k_\text{B} T} + 1}.</math>

Quantum and classical regimes

The Fermi–Dirac distribution approaches the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution in the limit of high temperature and low particle density, without the need for any ad hoc assumptions:

  • In the limit of low particle density, <math>

\bar{n}_i = \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon_i-\mu)/k_{\rm B}T}+1} \ll 1

</math>, therefore <math>

e^{(\varepsilon_i-\mu)/k_{\rm B}T}+1 \gg 1

</math> or equivalently <math>

e^{(\varepsilon_i-\mu)/k_{\rm B}T} \gg 1

</math>. In that case, <math>

\bar{n}_i \approx \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon_i-\mu)/k_{\rm B}T=\frac{N}{Z}e^{-\varepsilon_i/k_{\rm B}T}

</math>, which is the result from Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

  • In the limit of high temperature, the particles are distributed over a large range of energy values, therefore the occupancy on each state (especially the high energy ones with <math>\varepsilon_i - \mu \gg k_{\rm B}T</math>) is again very small, <math>

\bar{n}_i = \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon_i-\mu)/k_{\rm B}T}+1} \ll 1

</math>. This again reduces to Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

The classical regime, where Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics can be used as an approximation to Fermi–Dirac statistics, is found by considering the situation that is far from the limit imposed by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for a particle's position and momentum. For example, in physics of semiconductor, when the density of states of conduction band is much higher than the doping concentration, the energy gap between conduction band and fermi level could be calculated using Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. Otherwise, if the doping concentration is not negligible compared to density of states of conduction band, the Fermi–Dirac distribution should be used instead for accurate calculation. It can then be shown that the classical situation prevails when the concentration of particles corresponds to an average interparticle separation <math> \bar{R} </math> that is much greater than the average de Broglie wavelength <math> \bar{\lambda} </math> of the particles:

<math display="block">\bar{R} \gg \bar{\lambda} \approx \frac{h}{\sqrt{3mk_{\rm B}T, </math>

where is the Planck constant, and is the mass of a particle.

For the case of conduction electrons in a typical metal at = 300&nbsp;K (i.e. approximately room temperature), the system is far from the classical regime because <math> \bar{R} \approx \bar{\lambda}/25 </math> . This is due to the small mass of the electron and the high concentration (i.e. small <math>\bar{R}</math>) of conduction electrons in the metal. Thus Fermi–Dirac statistics is needed for conduction electrons in a typical metal.), its high electron concentration and the small mass of each electron precludes using a classical approximation, and again Fermi–Dirac statistics is required. In this ensemble, the system is able to exchange energy and exchange particles with a reservoir (temperature T and chemical potential μ fixed by the reservoir).

Due to the non-interacting quality, each available single-particle level (with energy level ϵ) forms a separate thermodynamic system in contact with the reservoir.

In other words, each single-particle level is a separate, tiny grand canonical ensemble.

By the Pauli exclusion principle, there are only two possible microstates for the single-particle level: no particle (energy E = 0), or one particle (energy E = ε). The resulting partition function for that single-particle level therefore has just two terms:

<math display="block"> \begin{align}

\mathcal Z &= \exp\big(0(\mu - \varepsilon)/k_{\rm B} T\big) + \exp\big(1(\mu - \varepsilon)/k_{\rm B} T\big) \\

&= 1 + \exp\big((\mu - \varepsilon)/k_{\rm B} T\big),

\end{align}</math>

and the average particle number for that single-particle level substate is given by

<math display="block"> \langle N\rangle = k_{\rm B} T \frac{1}{\mathcal Z} \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal Z}{\partial \mu}\right)_{V,T} = \frac{1}{\exp\big((\varepsilon-\mu)/k_{\rm B} T\big) + 1}. </math>

This result applies for each single-particle level, and thus gives the Fermi–Dirac distribution for the entire state of the system. where the ability of an energy level to contribute to transport phenomena is proportional to <math>\big\langle (\Delta N)^2 \big\rangle</math>.

Canonical ensemble

It is also possible to derive Fermi–Dirac statistics in the canonical ensemble. Consider a many-particle system composed of N identical fermions that have negligible mutual interaction and are in thermal equilibrium.

<math display="block">P_R = \frac{e^{-\beta E_R{\displaystyle\sum_{R'} e^{-\beta E_{R'},</math>

where <math>\beta = 1/k_\text{B}T</math>, <math>e^{-\beta E_R}</math> is called the Boltzmann factor, and the summation is over all possible states <math>R'</math> of the many-particle system. The average value for an occupancy number <math>n_i</math> is will be used to find an expression to substitute for <math>Z_i(N)/Z_i(N - 1)</math>:

<math display="block">\begin{align}

\ln Z_i(N - 1) &\simeq \ln Z_i(N) - \frac{\partial \ln Z_i(N)}{\partial N } \\

&= \ln Z_i(N) - \alpha_i,

\end{align}</math>

where <math>\alpha_i \equiv \frac{\partial \ln Z_i(N)}{\partial N}.</math>

If the number of particles <math>N</math> is large enough so that the change in the chemical potential <math>\mu</math> is very small when a particle is added to the system, then <math>\alpha_i \simeq - \mu / k_\text{B}T.</math> Applying the exponential function to both sides, substituting for <math>\alpha_i</math> and rearranging,

<math display="block">Z_i(N) / Z_i(N - 1) = e^{-\mu / k_\text{B}T}.</math>

Substituting the above into the equation for <math>\bar{n}_i</math> and using a previous definition of <math>\beta</math> to substitute <math>1/k_\text{B}T</math> for <math>\beta</math>, results in the Fermi–Dirac distribution:

<math display="block">\bar{n}_i = \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon_i - \mu)/k_\text{B}T} + 1}.</math>

Like the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution and the Bose–Einstein distribution, the Fermi–Dirac distribution can also be derived by the Darwin–Fowler method of mean values.

Microcanonical ensemble

A result can be achieved by directly analyzing the multiplicities of the system and using Lagrange multipliers.

Suppose we have a number of energy levels, labeled by index i, each level having energy ε<sub>i</sub> and containing a total of n<sub>i</sub> particles. Suppose each level contains g<sub>i</sub> distinct sublevels, all of which have the same energy, and which are distinguishable. For example, two particles may have different momenta (i.e. their momenta may be along different directions), in which case they are distinguishable from each other, yet they can still have the same energy. The value of g<sub>i</sub> associated with level i is called the "degeneracy" of that energy level. The Pauli exclusion principle states that only one fermion can occupy any such sublevel.

The number of ways of distributing n<sub>i</sub> indistinguishable particles among the g<sub>i</sub> sublevels of an energy level, with a maximum of one particle per sublevel, is given by the binomial coefficient, using its combinatorial interpretation:

<math display="block">

w(n_i, g_i) = \frac{g_i!}{n_i!(g_i - n_i)!}.

</math>

For example, distributing two particles in three sublevels will give population numbers of 110, 101, or 011 for a total of three ways which equals&nbsp;3!/(2!1!).

The number of ways that a set of occupation numbers n<sub>i</sub> can be realized is the product of the ways that each individual energy level can be populated:

<math display="block">

W = \prod_i w(n_i, g_i) = \prod_i \frac{g_i!}{n_i!(g_i - n_i)!}.

</math>

Following the same procedure used in deriving the Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics, we wish to find the set of n<sub>i</sub> for which W is maximized, subject to the constraint that there be a fixed number of particles and a fixed energy. We constrain our solution using Lagrange multipliers forming the function:

<math display="block">

f(n_i) = \ln W + \alpha\left(N - \sum n_i\right) + \beta\left(E - \sum n_i \varepsilon_i\right).

</math>

Using Stirling's approximation for the factorials, taking the derivative with respect to n<sub>i</sub>, setting the result to zero, and solving for n<sub>i</sub> yields the Fermi–Dirac population numbers:

<math display="block">

n_i = \frac{g_i}{e^{\alpha + \beta\varepsilon_i} + 1}.

</math>

By a process similar to that outlined in the Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics article, it can be shown thermodynamically that <math>\beta = \tfrac{1}{k_\text{B}T}</math> and <math>\alpha = -\tfrac{\mu}{k_\text{B}T}</math>, so that finally, the probability that a state will be occupied is

<math display="block">

\bar{n}_i = \frac{n_i}{g_i} = \frac{1}{e^{(\varepsilon_i - \mu)/k_\text{B}T} + 1}.

</math>

See also

  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • Pauli exclusion principle
  • Complete Fermi-Dirac integral
  • Fermi level
  • Fermi gas
  • Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics
  • Bose–Einstein statistics
  • Parastatistics
  • Logistic function
  • Sigmoid function

Notes

References

Further reading

<!-- Editors: Please do not add the probability distributions template here. The Fermi Dirac distribution is not a probability distribution. -->