{| class="wikitable" align="right" style="margin-left:10px" width="250"
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3 colspan=2 align=center|Set of uniform duoprisms
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Type||Prismatic uniform 4-polytopes
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Schläfli symbol||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Coxeter-Dynkin diagram||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Cells||-gonal prisms,<BR>-gonal prisms
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Faces|| squares,<BR>-gons,<BR>-gons
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Edges||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Vertices||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Vertex figure||100px<BR>disphenoid
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Symmetry||, order
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Dual|| duopyramid
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Properties||convex, vertex-uniform
|-
|colspan=2|
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3 colspan=2 align=center|Set of uniform p-p duoprisms
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Type||Prismatic uniform 4-polytope
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Schläfli symbol||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Coxeter-Dynkin diagram||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Cells||-gonal prisms
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Faces|| squares,<BR>-gons
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Edges||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Vertices||
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Symmetry|| order
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Dual|| duopyramid
|-
|bgcolor=#e7dcc3|Properties||convex, vertex-uniform, Facet-transitive
|}
thumb|320px|A close up inside the 23-29 duoprism projected onto a 3-sphere, and perspective projected to 3-space. As and become large, a duoprism approaches the geometry of [[duocylinder just like a -gonal prism approaches a cylinder.]]
In geometry of 4 dimensions or higher, a double prism or duoprism is a polytope resulting from the Cartesian product of two polytopes, each of two dimensions or higher. The Cartesian product of an -polytope and an -polytope is an -polytope, where and are dimensions of 2 (polygon) or higher.
The lowest-dimensional duoprisms exist in 4-dimensional space as 4-polytopes being the Cartesian product of two polygons in 2-dimensional Euclidean space. More precisely, it is the set of points:
:<math>P_1 \times P_2 = \{ (x,y,z,w) | (x,y)\in P_1, (z,w)\in P_2 \}</math>
where and are the sets of the points contained in the respective polygons. Such a duoprism is convex if both bases are convex, and is bounded by prismatic cells.
Nomenclature
Four-dimensional duoprisms are considered to be prismatic 4-polytopes. A duoprism constructed from two regular polygons of the same edge length is a uniform duoprism.
A duoprism made of n-polygons and m-polygons is named by prefixing 'duoprism' with the names of the base polygons, for example: a triangular-pentagonal duoprism is the Cartesian product of a triangle and a pentagon.
An alternative, more concise way of specifying a particular duoprism is by prefixing with numbers denoting the base polygons, for example: 3,5-duoprism for the triangular-pentagonal duoprism.
Other alternative names:
- q-gonal-p-gonal prism
- q-gonal-p-gonal double prism
- q-gonal-p-gonal hyperprism
The term duoprism is coined by George Olshevsky, shortened from double prism. John Horton Conway proposed a similar name proprism for product prism, a Cartesian product of two or more polytopes of dimension at least two. The duoprisms are proprisms formed from exactly two polytopes.
Example 16-16 duoprism
{|class=wikitable width=500
|- align=center
|Schlegel diagram<BR>250px<BR>Projection from the center of one 16-gonal prism, and all but one of the opposite 16-gonal prisms are shown.
|net<BR>250px<BR>The two sets of 16-gonal prisms are shown. The top and bottom faces of the vertical cylinder are connected when folded together in 4D.
|}
Geometry of 4-dimensional duoprisms
A 4-dimensional uniform duoprism is created by the product of a regular n-sided polygon and a regular m-sided polygon with the same edge length. It is bounded by n m-gonal prisms and m n-gonal prisms. For example, the Cartesian product of a triangle and a hexagon is a duoprism bounded by 6 triangular prisms and 3 hexagonal prisms.
- When m and n are identical, the resulting duoprism is bounded by 2n identical n-gonal prisms. For example, the Cartesian product of two triangles is a duoprism bounded by 6 triangular prisms.
- When m and n are identically 4, the resulting duoprism is bounded by 8 square prisms (cubes), and is identical to the tesseract.
The m-gonal prisms are attached to each other via their m-gonal faces, and form a closed loop. Similarly, the n-gonal prisms are attached to each other via their n-gonal faces, and form a second loop perpendicular to the first. These two loops are attached to each other via their square faces, and are mutually perpendicular.
As m and n approach infinity, the corresponding duoprisms approach the duocylinder. As such, duoprisms are useful as non-quadric approximations of the duocylinder.
Nets
{| class=wikitable
|- align=center
|100px<BR>3-3
|- align=center
|100px<BR>3-4
|100px<BR>4-4
|-
|100px<BR>3-5
|100px<BR>4-5
|100px<BR>5-5
|-
|100px<BR>3-6
|100px<BR>4-6
|100px<BR>5-6
|100px<BR>6-6
|-
|100px<BR>3-7
|100px<BR>4-7
|100px<BR>5-7
|100px<BR>6-7
|100px<BR>7-7
|-
|100px<BR>3-8
|100px<BR>4-8
|100px<BR>5-8
|100px<BR>6-8
|100px<BR>7-8
|100px<BR>8-8
|-
|100px<BR>3-9
|100px<BR>4-9
|100px<BR>5-9
|100px<BR>6-9
|100px<BR>7-9
|100px<BR>8-9
|100px<BR>9-9
|-
|100px<BR>3-10
|100px<BR>4-10
|100px<BR>5-10
|100px<BR>6-10
|100px<BR>7-10
|100px<BR>8-10
|100px<BR>9-10
|100px<BR>10-10
|}
Perspective projections
A cell-centered perspective projection makes a duoprism look like a torus, with two sets of orthogonal cells, p-gonal and q-gonal prisms.
{| class=wikitable width=480
|+ Schlegel diagrams
|160px
|160px
|-
!6-prism
!6-6 duoprism
|-
|colspan=2|A hexagonal prism, projected into the plane by perspective, centered on a hexagonal face, looks like a double hexagon connected by (distorted) squares. Similarly a 6-6 duoprism projected into 3D approximates a torus, hexagonal both in plan and in section.
|}
The p-q duoprisms are identical to the q-p duoprisms, but look different in these projections because they are projected in the center of different cells.
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Schlegel diagrams
|- align=center
|75px<BR>3-3<!--<BR>(triddip)-->
|75px<BR>3-4<!--<BR>(tisdip)-->
|75px<BR>3-5<!--<BR>(trapedip)-->
|75px<BR>3-6<!--<BR>(thiddip)-->
|75px<BR>3-7<!--<BR>(theddip)-->
|75px<BR>3-8<!--<BR>(todip)-->
|- align=center
|75px<BR>4-3<!--<BR>(tisdip)-->
|75px<BR>4-4<!--<BR>(tes)-->
|75px<BR>4-5<!--<BR>(squipdip)-->
|75px<BR>4-6<!--<BR>(shiddip)-->
|75px<BR>4-7<!--<BR>(shedip)-->
|75px<BR>4-8<!--<BR>(sodip)-->
|- align=center
|75px<BR>5-3<!--<BR>(trapedip)-->
|75px<BR>5-4<!--<BR>(squipdip)-->
|75px<BR>5-5<!--<BR>(pedip)-->
|75px<BR>5-6<!--<BR>(phiddip)-->
|75px<BR>5-7<!--<BR>(pheddip)-->
|75px<BR>5-8<!--<BR>(podip)-->
|- align=center
|75px<BR>6-3<!--<BR>(thiddip)-->
|75px<BR>6-4<!--<BR>(shiddip)-->
|75px<BR>6-5<!--<BR>(phiddip)-->
|75px<BR>6-6<!--<BR>(hiddip)-->
|75px<BR>6-7<!--<BR>(hahedip)-->
|75px<BR>6-8<!--<BR>(hodip)-->
|- align=center
|75px<BR>7-3<!--<BR>(theddip)-->
|75px<BR>7-4<!--<BR>(shedip)-->
|75px<BR>7-5<!--<BR>(pheddip)-->
|75px<BR>7-6<!--<BR>(hahedip)-->
|75px<BR>7-7<!--<BR>(hedip)-->
|75px<BR>7-8<!--<BR>(heodip)-->
|- align=center
|75px<BR>8-3<!--<BR>(todip)-->
|75px<BR>8-4<!--<BR>(sodip)-->
|75px<BR>8-5<!--<BR>(podip)-->
|75px<BR>8-6<!--<BR>(hodip)-->
|75px<BR>8-7<!--<BR>(heodip)-->
|75px<BR>8-8<!--<BR>(odip)-->
|}
Orthogonal projections
Vertex-centered orthogonal projections of p-p duoprisms project into [2n] symmetry for odd degrees, and [n] for even degrees. There are n vertices projected into the center. For 4,4, it represents the A<sub>3</sub> Coxeter plane of the tesseract. The 5,5 projection is identical to the 3D rhombic triacontahedron.
{| class=wikitable
|+ Orthogonal projection wireframes of p-p duoprisms
|-
!colspan=12|Odd
|-
!colspan=3|3-3
!colspan=3|5-5
!colspan=3|7-7
!colspan=3|9-9
|-
|60px||60px||60px
|60px||60px||60px
|60px||60px||60px
|60px||60px||60px
|- align=center
|colspan=2|[3]
|[6]
|colspan=2|[5]
|[10]
|colspan=2|[7]
|[14]
|colspan=2|[9]
|[18]
|-
!colspan=12|Even
|-
!colspan=3|4-4 (tesseract)
!colspan=3|6-6
!colspan=3|8-8
!colspan=3|10-10
|-
|60px||60px||60px
|60px||60px||60px
||60px||60px||60px
||60px||60px||60px
|- align=center
|colspan=2|[4]
|[8]
|colspan=2|[6]
|[12]
|colspan=2|[8]
|[16]
|colspan=2|[10]
|[20]
|}
Related polytopes
right|frame|A [[stereographic projection of a rotating duocylinder, divided into a checkerboard surface of squares from the {4,4n} skew polyhedron]]
The regular skew polyhedron, {4,4|n}, exists in 4-space as the n<sup>2</sup> square faces of a n-n duoprism, using all 2n<sup>2</sup> edges and n<sup>2</sup> vertices. The 2n n-gonal faces can be seen as removed. (skew polyhedra can be seen in the same way by a n-m duoprism, but these are not regular.)
Duoantiprism
thumb|left|120px|p-q duoantiprism [[vertex figure, a gyrobifastigium]]
thumb|[[Great duoantiprism, stereographic projection, centred on one pentagrammic crossed-antiprism]]
Like the antiprisms as alternated prisms, there is a set of 4-dimensional duoantiprisms: 4-polytopes that can be created by an alternation operation applied to a duoprism. The alternated vertices create nonregular tetrahedral cells, except for the special case, the 4-4 duoprism (tesseract) which creates the uniform (and regular) 16-cell. The 16-cell is the only convex uniform duoantiprism.
The duoprisms , t<sub>0,1,2,3</sub>{p,2,q}, can be alternated into , ht<sub>0,1,2,3</sub>{p,2,q}, the "duoantiprisms", which cannot be made uniform in general. The only convex uniform solution is the trivial case of p=q=2, which is a lower symmetry construction of the tesseract , t<sub>0,1,2,3</sub>{2,2,2}, with its alternation as the 16-cell, , s{2}s{2}.
The only nonconvex uniform solution is p=5, q=5/3, ht<sub>0,1,2,3</sub>{5,2,5/3}, , constructed from 10 pentagonal antiprisms, 10 pentagrammic crossed-antiprisms, and 50 tetrahedra, known as the great duoantiprism (gudap).
Ditetragoltriates
Also related are the ditetragoltriates or octagoltriates, formed by taking the octagon (considered to be a ditetragon or a truncated square) to a p-gon. The octagon of a p-gon can be clearly defined if one assumes that the octagon is the convex hull of two perpendicular rectangles; then the p-gonal ditetragoltriate is the convex hull of two p-p duoprisms (where the p-gons are similar but not congruent, having different sizes) in perpendicular orientations. The resulting polychoron is isogonal and has 2p p-gonal prisms and p<sup>2</sup> rectangular trapezoprisms (a cube with D<sub>2d</sub> symmetry) but cannot be made uniform. The vertex figure is a triangular bipyramid.
Double antiprismoids
Like the duoantiprisms as alternated duoprisms, there is a set of p-gonal double antiprismoids created by alternating the 2p-gonal ditetragoltriates, creating p-gonal antiprisms and tetrahedra while reinterpreting the non-corealmic triangular bipyramidal spaces as two tetrahedra. The resulting figure is generally not uniform except for two cases: the grand antiprism and its conjugate, the pentagrammic double antiprismoid (with p = 5 and 5/3 respectively), represented as the alternation of a decagonal or decagrammic ditetragoltriate. The vertex figure is a variant of the sphenocorona.
k<sub>22</sub> polytopes
The 3-3 duoprism, −1<sub>22</sub>, is first in a dimensional series of uniform polytopes, expressed by Coxeter as k<sub>22</sub> series. The 3-3 duoprism is the vertex figure for the second, the birectified 5-simplex. The fourth figure is a Euclidean honeycomb, 2<sub>22</sub>, and the final is a paracompact hyperbolic honeycomb, 3<sub>22</sub>, with Coxeter group [3<sup>2,2,3</sup>], <math>{\bar{T_7</math>. Each progressive uniform polytope is constructed from the previous as its vertex figure.
See also
- Polytope and 4-polytope
- Convex regular 4-polytope
- Duocylinder
- Tesseract
Notes
References
- Regular Polytopes, H. S. M. Coxeter, Dover Publications, Inc., 1973, New York, p. 124.
- Coxeter, The Beauty of Geometry: Twelve Essays, Dover Publications, 1999, (Chapter 5: Regular Skew Polyhedra in three and four dimensions and their topological analogues)
- Coxeter, H. S. M. Regular Skew Polyhedra in Three and Four Dimensions. Proc. London Math. Soc. 43, 33-62, 1937.
- John H. Conway, Heidi Burgiel, Chaim Goodman-Strauss, The Symmetries of Things 2008, (Chapter 26)
- N.W. Johnson: The Theory of Uniform Polytopes and Honeycombs, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto, 1966
