The District Court of Western Australia is the intermediate court in Western Australia. The District Court commenced in 1970, amid additional stress placed on the existing Magistrates Court and Supreme Court due to the increasing population of Western Australia. At its inception, the Court consisted of four judges: Sydney Howard Good, William Page Pidgeon, Desmond Charles Heenan and Robert Edmond Jones.
In the Criminal jurisdiction it hears serious, indictable criminal offences for which the maximum penalty is 25 years imprisonment. In the Civil jurisdiction, the District Court hears civil claims of up to $750 000 and has unlimited jurisdiction in claims for damages in personal injury cases. Decisions from the Magistrates Court and some tribunals can be appealed against in the District Court. The court is low in the Australian court hierarchy.
The current Chief Judge of the District Court is Julie Anne Wager, who has held the position since 2 May 2020.
History
Prior to the District Court's commencement, Western Australia's court system had two tiers: the lower tier consisting of the Court of Petty Sessions and the Local Court; and the upper tier consisting solely of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held jurisdiction over all indictable criminal offences and civil matters, whilst the Court of Petty Sessions held jurisdiction over summary criminal offences, committal jurisdiction for indictable offences, whilst the Local Court had jurisdiction to hear civil claims not exceeding $1,000, and not on categories of claims including ejectment, title to land, wills, libel, slander, seduction or breach of promise of marriage. The most distinct separation in decision making was between the jurisdiction of judges, who were officers of the Supreme Court, and stipendiary magistrates and Justices of the Peace of the lower Courts. During this period and towards the beginning of the 1960s, public interest in establishing an intermediary Court began, with the District Court commencing on 1 April 1970 following a proclamation by the Governor Douglas Kendrew on 26 March. According to Griffith (1969), the District Court was introduced to "enable adequate administration of justice in our expanding community." A more recent development has been the introduction of electronic document filing and trial systems for civil proceedings. It is a superior court, meaning it has unlimited jurisdiction for criminal matters and derives its power from legislation.
The District Court is given the jurisdiction to hear criminal cases. At introduction, the District Court only had jurisdiction over indictable offences where the maximum punishment was less than 14 years, as these matters were tried in the Supreme Court. As the judicial system has reformed, the District Court now has jurisdiction over all indictable offences except for murder, manslaughter, attempts to unlawfully kill and the offence of preventing the birth of a live child. The District Court can hear appeals to reconsider the factual evidence from a primary court such as the local court.
The District Court also holds jurisdiction to determine civil actions. Initially, the limit on claimable sum was $6,000 at the Court's inception, It is unclear whether or not the District Court can exercise equitable jurisdiction, however the District Court held that its legislating act does not expressly confer on the Court jurisdiction to grant the equitable remedy of specific performance.
Appeals can be made against decisions of the District Court. Appeals are made to the Court of Appeals division of the Supreme Court.
Rules
Cases determined in the District Court must follow the District Court Rules 2005 (WA). Between 1996 and 2005, District Court cases were required to abide by the District Court Rules 1996 (WA). These rules include the filing and service of court documents, rules regarding pre-trial case management, rules regarding the submission and handling of evidence,
In addition, cases heard in the District Court must also follow the rules of the Supreme Court, unless there is an inconsistency in which case the District Court Rules 2005 (WA) prevails.
Buildings
thumb|Central Law Courts building, which is the current residence of the Magistrates Court
Perth Registry
The District Court was initially situated in the Old Supreme Court Building in Perth, but moved to the Public Trust Office in 1971 where it sat for ten years until 1982. however by the 1990s and 2000s it was recognised that the District Court had accumulated systemic backlog and had outgrown the Central Law Courts building.
thumb|St Georges Hall facade as part of the District Court Building
The District Court's current residence at 500 Hay Street was the location of the former St George's Hall, and was retained on the external walls of the Courthouse after considerable liaison with the Heritage Council.
The present District Court building began construction in 2005, with the building being completed in 2008.
Judicial Appointments
Appointment criteria
The District Court of Western Australia Act 1969 introduced criteria for the appointment of judges. Judges are appointed by the Governor of Western Australia, and enjoy tenure of office on the condition of good behaviour, although the Governor can "upon the address of both Houses of Parliament, remove any District Court judge from his office and revoke his commission". As with Supreme Court judges, District Court judges have a mandatory retirement age of 70 years. Judges are eligible for appointment if they are admitted lawyers in Australia, and have no less than eight years of legal experience. Auxiliary judges are appointed where there are pending proceedings that a retiring judge is involved in, so that the hearing or determination can be completed by the retiring judge.
Chief Judges
At its inception, the District Court had four serving judges, with Sydney Good appointed as the first Chairman of Judges. The title of Chairman of Judges was later changed to Chief Judge, during the tenure of Desmond Heenan. To date there have been eight Chief Judges.
