150px|right|thumb|This is a demonstration of the message with color added to highlight its separate parts. The binary transmission sent carried no color information.

The Arecibo message is an interstellar radio message carrying basic information about humanity and Earth that was sent to the globular cluster Messier 13 (M13) in 1974. It was meant as a demonstration of human technological achievement rather than a real attempt to enter into a conversation with extraterrestrials. The message was aimed at the current location of M13, about 25,000 light years from Earth, because M13 was a large and relatively close collection of stars that was available in the sky at the time and place of the ceremony. When correctly translated into graphics, characters, and spaces, the 1,679 bits of data contained within the message form the image shown here.

Description

The content of the Arecibo message was designed by a group of Cornell University and Arecibo scientists: Frank Drake, formulator of the Drake equation; James C. G. Walker; Linda M. French; and Richard Isaacman.

The number 1,679 was chosen because it is a semiprime (the product of two prime numbers), to be arranged rectangularly as 73 rows by 23 columns. The alternative arrangement, 23 rows by 73 columns, produces an unintelligible set of characters.

Message as binary string

The message as a binary string is included below. Note that the choice of 1 representing higher frequency and 0 representing lower frequency is entirely arbitrary and the line breaks after every 23 bits are only included to allow for some ease in human readability.

<pre>

00000010101010000000000

00101000001010000000100

10001000100010010110010

10101010101010100100100

00000000000000000000000

00000000000011000000000

00000000001101000000000

00000000001101000000000

00000000010101000000000

00000000011111000000000

00000000000000000000000

11000011100011000011000

10000000000000110010000

11010001100011000011010

11111011111011111011111

00000000000000000000000

00010000000000000000010

00000000000000000000000

00001000000000000000001

11111000000000000011111

00000000000000000000000

11000011000011100011000

10000000100000000010000

11010000110001110011010

11111011111011111011111

00000000000000000000000

00010000001100000000010

00000000001100000000000

00001000001100000000001

11111000001100000011111

00000000001100000000000

00100000000100000000100

00010000001100000001000

00001100001100000010000

00000011000100001100000

00000000001100110000000

00000011000100001100000

00001100001100000010000

00010000001000000001000

00100000001100000000100

01000000001100000000100

01000000000100000001000

00100000001000000010000

00010000000000001100000

00001100000000110000000

00100011101011000000000

00100000001000000000000

00100000111110000000000

00100001011101001011011

00000010011100100111111

10111000011100000110111

00000000010100000111011

00100000010100000111111

00100000010100000110000

00100000110110000000000

00000000000000000000000

00111000001000000000000

00111010100010101010101

00111000000000101010100

00000000000000101000000

00000000111110000000000

00000011111111100000000

00001110000000111000000

00011000000000001100000

00110100000000010110000

01100110000000110011000

01000101000001010001000

01000100100010010001000

00000100010100010000000

00000100001000010000000

00000100000000010000000

00000001001010000000000

01111001111101001111000</pre>

Numbers

Part 1 — The numbers from 1 to 10|right

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

----------------------

0 0 0 1 1 1 1 00 00 00

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 00 00 10

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 01 11 01

X X X X X X X X X X <-Least-significant-digit marker.

The numbers from 1 to 10 appear in binary format, to be read from the top down. The bottom row contains markers which indicate the column from which the binary code for each number is intended to begin.

Even assuming that any extraterrestrial recipients would recognize binary, the encoding of the numbers may not be immediately obvious because of the way they have been written. To read the first seven digits, ignore the bottom row, and read them as three binary digits from top to bottom, with the top digit being the most significant. The readings for 8, 9, and 10 are a little different, as their binary code has been distributed across an additional column next to the first (to the right in the image). This is intended to show that numbers too large to fit in a single column can be written in several contiguous ones (a scheme which is used elsewhere in the message). The additional columns are not marked by the least-significant-digit marker.

DNA elements

Part 2 — The elements constituting DNA|right

H C N O P

1 6 7 8 15

----------

0 0 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 1

0 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 1

X X X X X

The numbers 1, 6, 7, 8, and 15 appear, denoting the atomic numbers of hydrogen (H), carbon (C), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), and phosphorus (P), the elements from which DNA is composed.

Nucleotides

{| style="width: 100%; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px"

|-

| rowspan="6" style="width: 0%; height: 306px" | Part 3 — The nucleotides of DNA

| colspan="5" style="width: 100%; height: 59px" |

|-

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Deoxyribose<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Adenine<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N<sub>5</sub>)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Thymine<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Deoxyribose<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O)

| style="width: 100%; height: 47px" |

|-

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Phosphate<br />(PO<sub>4</sub>)

|

|

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Phosphate<br />(PO<sub>4</sub>)

| style="width: 100%; height: 47px" |

|-

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Deoxyribose<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Cytosine

(C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Guanine

(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N<sub>5</sub>O)

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Deoxyribose<br />(C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O)

| style="width: 100%; height: 47px" |

|-

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Phosphate<br />(PO<sub>4</sub>)

|

|

| style="padding-left: 1.5em" | Phosphate<br />(PO<sub>4</sub>)

| style="width: 100%; height: 47px" |

|-

| colspan="5" style="width: 100%; height: 59px" |

|}

The chemical groups from which the nucleotides of polymeric DNA sequences are built – the sugar deoxyribose, phosphate, and the four canonical nucleobases used in DNA – are then described as sequences of the five elements that appear on the preceding line. Each sequence represents the molecular formula of the chemical as it exists when incorporated into DNA (as opposed to the free form).

For example, the compound in the top left in the image is deoxyribose (C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>O in DNA, C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>4</sub> when free), whose formula is read as:

11000

10000

11010

XXXXX

-----

75010

i.e., 7 atoms of hydrogen, 5 atoms of carbon, 0 atoms of nitrogen, 1 atom of oxygen, and 0 atoms of phosphorus.

It is displayed in this order because the DNA Elements in the previous section (Purple image as reference) describe hydrogen (H), carbon (C), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), and phosphorus (P) in that order as well.

Double helix

Part 4 — The DNA double helix structure|right

11

11

11

11

11

01

11

11

01

11

01

11

10

11

11

01

X

11111111 11110111 11111011 01011110 (binary) [Using the double vertical columns above, read from top to bottom starting from the right column first, and then top to bottom from the left column.]

= 4,294,441,822 (decimal)

A graphic of the approximate shape of the double helix in which double-stranded DNA polymers naturally exist; the vertical bar in the middle is a binary representation of the number of nucleotide base pairs in the human genome. The value depicted is around 4.3 billion, which was believed to be the case when the message was transmitted in 1974; it is now known that there are only approximately 3.2 billion base pairs in the human genome.

Humanity

{|

| style="vertical-align: top" |Part 5 — Human form, the height and population of humans|thumb

|<pre style="width:35em"> ʌ X011011

| 111111

| 110111

X0111 111011

| 111111

v 110000

</pre>

1110 (binary) = 14 (decimal)

000011 111111 110111 111011 111111 110110 (binary)

= 4,292,853,750 (decimal)

|}

The graphic in the center is a simple illustration of a human being. The element on the left (in the image) indicates the average height of an adult male in the US: . This value is indicated by a horizontally written binary representation of the number 14, which is intended to be multiplied by the wavelength of the message (126&nbsp;mm); 14 × 126 = 1,764 millimeters.

The element on the right of the image indicates the size of the global human population in 1974, approximately 4.3&nbsp;billion (which, coincidentally, is within 0.1% of the number of DNA base pairs suggested for the size of the human genome earlier in the message). In this case, the number is oriented in the data horizontally rather than vertically. The least-significant-digit marker is in the upper left in the image, with bits going to the right and more significant digits below.

Planets

Part 6 — The Sun and the planets|left

<pre style="width: 60em"> Earth

Sun Mercury Venus Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto</pre>

A graphic depicting the Solar System, showing the Sun and nine planets in the order of their distance from the Sun: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto (Pluto was reclassified in 2006 as a dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union). Earth is the third planet from the Sun; its graphic is shifted up to identify it as the planet from which the signal was sent. Additionally, the human figure is shown just above the Earth graphic.

In addition to showing position, the graphic provides a general, not-to-scale size reference of each planet and the Sun.

Telescope

Part 7 — The Arecibo radio telescope|left

<pre style="max-width: 35em">bottom middle two rows shown in White as reference in the image:

100101

<--- 111110X ---></pre><pre style="max-width: 35em">100101 111110 (binary) = 2,430 (decimal)</pre>

The Arecibo message depicted as 23 rows and 73 columns. The meaningful shapes that appear in the intended format (73 rows and 23 columns) are not visible.|thumb|right

The last part is a graphic representing the Arecibo radio telescope and indicating its diameter with a binary representation of the number 2,430; multiplying by the wavelength of 126&nbsp;mm gives . In this case, the number is oriented horizontally, with the least-significant-digit marker to the lower right in the image.

The part of the image that resembles a letter "M" is there to demonstrate that the curved line is a concave curved mirror.

Arecibo Answer crop circle hoax

<!-- DO NOT remove the word “hoax” from the section title without a consensus on the talk page -->

125px|right|thumb|The Arecibo reply was the name given to a crop circle that was made in the farmland next to the Chilbolton radio telescope in Hampshire, UK, on 19 August 2001. It was 75 feet wide and 120 feet long.

The "Hampshire pattern" or "Chilbolton Code formation" or "Arecibo answer" was a crop circle that appeared in 2001 near the Chilbolton radio telescope in Hampshire, UK, which echoed the visual representation and most of the information from the original Arecibo message with some significant differences including location/origin, DNA configuration, and appearance.

The SETI Institute Online rebutted the idea that this was a genuine extraterrestrial response, by saying, "This is highly improbable. There is no evidence to suggest an other-than-earthly origin for these graphics." The crop circle is a near replica of the Arecibo message, with the same 23 × 73 grid. Most of the chemical data remains the same, with the exception that in the section detailing important chemical elements, silicon has been added, and the diagram of DNA has been rewritten. At the bottom, the pictogram of a human is replaced with a figure with a large, bulbous head.

Computational analysis

Some researchers have analysed whether the Arecibo signal could be identified as a carrying message by some information theoretic measure that was agnostic in the sense that it does not know the particular shapes of a human or double-helix etc. Presumably such an agnostic measure would be all that any potential ETI could apply to this signal. It is also a useful testbed for humanity's own ability to detect potential extraterrestrial signals, as we would presumably be similarly agnostic about any shapes particularly special to the broadcasting ETI.

Mahon (2025) described an information theoretic measure of complexity, the LCC score, that gives a high score to human language and meaningful images (such as photographs or drawings), and to the Arecibo message, while also giving a low score to random noise signals and simple repetitive signals. This measure also identified the correct aspect ratio of 73 by 23. Other attempts have been made with varying degrees of success. Zenil et al. (2023) also identified the correct aspect ratio and distinguished it from random noise signals, but not from uniform or repetitive signals. McCowan et al. (1999) described a measure called entropic slope, which could differentiate between random noise or repetitive signals, and meaningful vocalisations by multiple species including humans, but did not detect a message in the Arecibo signal.

See also

  • Active SETI
  • Communication with extraterrestrial intelligence (CETI)
  • Cosmos, a 2019 science fiction film featuring a response to the Arecibo message
  • List of interstellar radio messages
  • METI (Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence) (organization)
  • Pioneer plaque
  • Voyager Golden Record
  • Wow! signal

References